Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10747144›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2000

Emergence of resistance of Candida albicans to clotrimazole in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children: in vitro and clinical correlations.

R Pelletier, J Peter, C Antin, C Gonzalez, L Wood, T J Walsh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Susceptibility to Clotrimazole ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. RSC chemical biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. F1000Research · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R PelletierPediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
J Peter
C Antin
C Gonzalez
L Wood
T J Walsh
Pediatric Oncology Group · CANational Cancer Institute · USCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) is a common opportunistic infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients and other immunocompromised hosts. Clotrimazole troches are widely used in the treatment of mucosal candidiasis. However, little is known about the potential contribution of clotrimazole resistance to the development of refractory mucosal candidiasis. We therefore investigated the potential emergence of resistance to clotrimazole in a prospectively monitored HIV-infected pediatric population receiving this azole. Adapting the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-A reference method for broth antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts to clotrimazole, we compared MICs in macrodilution and microdilution assays. We further analyzed the correlation between these in vitro findings and the clinical response to antifungal therapy. One isolate from each of 87 HIV-infected children was studied by the macrodilution and microdilution methods. Two inoculum sizes were tested by the macrodilution method (10(3) and 10(4) CFU/ml) in order to assess the effect of inoculum size on clotrimazole MICs. The same isolates also were tested using a noncolorimetric microdilution method. Clotrimazole concentrations ranged from 0.03 to 16 microg/ml. Readings were performed after incubation for 24 and 48 h at 35 degrees C. For 62 (71.2%) of 87 clinical isolates, the MICs were low (< or =0.06 microg/ml). The MIC for 90% of the strains tested was 0.5 microg/ml, and the highest MIC was 8 microg/ml. There was no significant difference between MICs at the two inoculum sizes. There was 89% agreement (+/-1 tube) between the microdilution method at 24 h and the macrodilution method at 48 h. If the MIC of clotrimazole for an isolate of C. albicans was > or =0.5 microg/ml, there was a significant risk (P < 0.001) of cross-resistance to other azoles: fluconazole, > or = 8 microg/ml (relative risk [RR] = 8.9); itraconazole, > or =1 microg/ml (RR = 10). Resistance to clotrimazole was highly associated with clinically overt failure of antifungal azole therapy. Six (40%) of 15 patients for whom the clotrimazole MIC was > or =0.5 microg/ml required amphotericin B for refractory mucosal candidiasis versus 4 (5.5%) of 72 for whom the MIC was <0.5 microg/ml (P = 0.001; 95% confidence interval = 2.3 to 22; RR = 7.2). These findings suggest that an interpretive breakpoint of 0.5 microg/ml may be useful in defining clotrimazole resistance in C. albicans. The clinical laboratory's ability to determine MICs of clotrimazole may help to distinguish microbiologic resistance from the other causes of refractory OPC, possibly reducing the usage of systemic antifungal agents. We conclude that resistance to clotrimazole develops in isolates of C. albicans from HIV-infected children, that cross-resistance to other azoles may develop concomitantly, and that this resistance correlates with refractory mucosal candidiasis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsAntifungal AgentsCandida albicansCandidiasis, OralChildChild, PreschoolClotrimazoleDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleHumansInfantMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOropharynxProspective StudiesAntifungal AgentsClotrimazole

Identifiers

PMID10747144
PMCPMC86490
OpenAlexW2107006865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.