Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10747068›Full record

ArticleGenetics2000

A detailed linkage map of medaka, Oryzias latipes: comparative genomics and genome evolution.

K Naruse, S Fukamachi, H Mitani, M Kondo, T Matsuoka, S Kondo, N Hanamura, Y Morita, K Hasegawa, R Nishigaki and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Construction of a high-density, high-resolution genetic map and its integration with BAC-based physical map in channel catfish.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2015
    Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

K NaruseDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. naruse@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
S Fukamachi
H Mitani
M Kondo
T Matsuoka
S Kondo
N Hanamura
Y Morita
K Hasegawa
R Nishigaki
A Shimada
H Wada
T Kusakabe
N Suzuki
M Kinoshita
A Kanamori
T Terado
H Kimura
M Nonaka
A Shima

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We mapped 633 markers (488 AFLPs, 28 RAPDs, 34 IRSs, 75 ESTs, 4 STSs, and 4 phenotypic markers) for the Medaka Oryzias latipes, a teleost fish of the order Beloniformes. Linkage was determined using a reference typing DNA panel from 39 cell lines derived from backcross progeny. This panel provided unlimited DNA for the accumulation of mapping data. The total map length of Medaka was 1354.5 cM and 24 linkage groups were detected, corresponding to the haploid chromosome number of the organism. Thirteen to 49 markers for each linkage group were obtained. Conserved synteny between Medaka and zebrafish was observed for 2 independent linkage groups. Unlike zebrafish, however, the Medaka linkage map showed obvious restriction of recombination on the linkage group containing the male-determining region (Y) locus compared to the autosomal chromosomes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic LinkageGenomeAnimalsBase SequenceCell LineChromosome MappingDNA PrimersGenes, HomeoboxMajor Histocompatibility ComplexOryziasSex ChromosomesDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID10747068
PMCPMC1461045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.