Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10747051›Full record

ArticleGenetics2000

Forkhead genes in transcriptional silencing, cell morphology and the cell cycle. Overlapping and distinct functions for FKH1 and FKH2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

P C Hollenhorst, M E Bose, M R Mielke, U Müller, C A Fox

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Forkhead GeneJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  7. Unveiling Forkhead-mediated regulation of yeast cell cycle and metabolic networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evolutionary engineering inBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Conserved forkhead dimerization motif controls DNA replication timing and spatial organization of chromosomes inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P C HollenhorstDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
M E Bose
M R Mielke
U Müller
C A Fox
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Origin Recognition Complex at Transcriptional SilencersR01GM056890 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FOX, CATHERINE A · 1998 to 2020
$6.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM56890-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SIR1 gene is one of four specialized genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae required for repressing transcription at the silent mating-type cassettes, HMLalpha and HMRa, by a mechanism known as silencing. Silencing requires the assembly of a specialized chromatin structure analogous to heterochromatin. FKH1 was isolated as a gene that, when expressed in multiple copies, could substitute for the function of SIR1 in silencing HMRa. FKH1 (Forkhead Homologue One) was named for its homology to the forkhead family of eukaryotic transcription factors classified on the basis of a conserved DNA binding domain. Deletion of FKH1 caused a defect in silencing HMRa, indicating that FKH1 has a positive role in silencing. Significantly, deletion of both FKH1 and its closest homologue in yeast, FKH2, caused a form of yeast pseudohyphal growth, indicating that the two genes have redundant functions in controlling yeast cell morphology. By several criteria, fkh1Delta fkh2Delta-induced pseudohyphal growth was distinct from the nutritionally induced form of pseudohyphal growth observed in some strains of S. cerevisiae. Although FKH2 is redundant with FKH1 in controlling pseudohyphal growth, the two genes have different functions in silencing HMRa. High-copy expression of CLB2, a G2/M-phase cyclin, prevented fkh1Delta fkh2Delta-induced pseudohyphal growth and modulated some of the fkhDelta-induced silencing phenotypes. Interestingly, deletions in either FKH1 or FKH2 alone caused subtle but opposite effects on cell-cycle progression and CLB2 mRNA expression, consistent with a role for each of these genes in modulating the cell cycle and having opposing effects on silencing. The differences between Fkh1p and Fkh2p in vivo were not attributable to differences in their DNA binding domains.

Indexed as

Gene SilencingCell CycleDNA-Binding ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsFungal ProteinsGenes, OverlappingRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsFungal ProteinsRNA, MessengerSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteinssep1 protein, S pombeTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID10747051
PMCPMC1461039
OpenAlexW1872596602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.