Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10747047›Full record

ArticleGenetics2000

Regulation of the yeast INO1 gene. The products of the INO2, INO4 and OPI1 regulatory genes are not required for repression in response to inositol.

J A Graves, S A Henry

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comprehensive Characterization of MutantJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Role for gene looping in intron-mediated enhancement of transcription.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J A GravesDepartment of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
S A Henry
Carnegie Mellon University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

GENETICS AND DEVELOPMENT OF YEAST MEMBRANE MUTANTSR01GM019629 · NIGMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY, SUSAN ARMSTRONG · 1985 to 2015
$6.0M
GENETIC REGULATION OF PHOSPHOLIPID SYNTHESIS IN YEASTR37GM019629 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI HENRY, SUSAN A. · 1991 to 2000
$426k
GENETIC REGULATION OF PHOSPHOLIPID BIOSYNTHESIS IN YEASTF31GM015972 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI GRAVES, JAMES A · 1993 to 1994
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-15972NIGMS NIH HHS GM-19629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ino2Delta, ino4Delta, opi1Delta, and sin3Delta mutations all affect expression of INO1, a structural gene for inositol-1-phosphate synthase. These same mutations affect other genes of phospholipid biosynthesis that, like INO1, contain the repeated element UAS(INO) (consensus 5' CATGTGAAAT 3'). In this study, we evaluated the effects of these four mutations, singly and in all possible combinations, on growth and expression of INO1. All strains carrying an ino2Delta or ino4Delta mutation, or both, failed to grow in medium lacking inositol. However, when grown in liquid culture in medium containing limiting amounts of inositol, the opi1Delta ino4Delta strain exhibited a level of INO1 expression comparable to, or higher than, the wild-type strain growing under the same conditions. Furthermore, INO1 expression in the opi1Delta ino4Delta strain was repressed in cells grown in medium fully supplemented with both inositol and choline. Similar results were obtained using the opi1Delta ino2Delta ino4Delta strain. Regulation of INO1 was also observed in the absence of the SIN3 gene product. Therefore, while Opi1p, Sin3p, and the Ino2p/Ino4p complex all affect the overall level of INO1 expression in an antagonistic manner, they do not appear to be responsible for transmitting the signal that leads to repression of INO1 in response to inositol. Various models for Opi1p function were tested and no evidence for binding of Opi1p to UAS(INO), or to Ino2p or Ino4p, was obtained.

Indexed as

Genes, RegulatorFungal ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, FungalInositolMutationMyo-Inositol-1-Phosphate SynthaseRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeFungal ProteinsInositolMyo-Inositol-1-Phosphate SynthaseRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID10747047
PMCPMC1461034
OpenAlexW2151759558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.