ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000
Cancer trends in England and Wales. Good data and analysis are vital to improving survival.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using functional data analysis models to estimate future time trends in age-specific breast cancer mortality for the United States and England-Wales.Journal of epidemiology · 2010Article
- Rates and sociodemographic correlates of cancer screening among South Asians.Journal of community health · 2009Article
- How complete and accurate are cancer registrations notified by the National Health Service Central Register for England and Wales?Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2001Article
- Survival and reduction in mortality from breast cancer. Impact of mammographic screening is not clear.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- Breast cancer screening. Screening has to be combined with good surgical and oncological services.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.