Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10737762›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2000

Predicting ligand-binding function in families of bacterial receptors.

J M Johnson, G M Church

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Construction of a sequence motif characteristic of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2003
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J M JohnsonGraduate Program in Biophysics and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
G M Church
Harvard University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The three-dimensional fold of a new protein sequence can often be inferred directly from sequence homology to a protein of known structure. The function of a new protein sequence is more difficult to predict, however, since homologues can have different molecular and cellular functions. To develop and automate computational methods for determining molecular function, we have analyzed ligand-binding specificity in two related families of binding proteins. One of these families includes Escherichia coli lactose repressor and ribose-binding protein, and the other includes E. coli sulfate- and phosphate-binding proteins. These proteins have similar folds but varying specificity, binding many different small molecules, including mono- and disaccharides, purines, oxyanions, ferric iron, and polyamines. Starting from template structural alignments, alignments of over 90 sequences per family were generated by iterative database searches with hidden Markov models. Phylogenetic trees were made of full-length sequences and of subsets of residues lining the binding cleft, to determine whether subbranches of the trees correlate with ligand-binding preference. Automated analyses of residues in the binding pocket were also used to predict ligand-binding function for many uncharacterized database sequences and to identify specific side chain-ligand contacts in proteins without solved structures. Our results demonstrate the utility of anchoring functional annotation within a protein family context.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesLigandsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPredictive Value of TestsProtein FoldingReceptors, Cell SurfaceSequence Homology, Amino AcidBacterial ProteinsLigandsReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID10737762
PMCPMC18125
OpenAlexW2149348072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.