ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2000
Predicting ligand-binding function in families of bacterial receptors.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- PREDIVAC: CD4+ T-cell epitope prediction for vaccine design that covers 95% of HLA class II DR protein diversity.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Stepwise conversion of a binding protein to a fluorescent switch: application to Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis ribose binding protein.Biochemistry · 2013Article
- LigProf: a simple tool for in silico prediction of ligand-binding sites.Journal of molecular modeling · 2007Article
- SDPpred: a tool for prediction of amino acid residues that determine differences in functional specificity of homologous proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2004Article
- Automated selection of positions determining functional specificity of proteins by comparative analysis of orthologous groups in protein families.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2004Article
- Construction of a sequence motif characteristic of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2003Article
- Structure modeling of the chemokine receptor CCR5: implications for ligand binding and selectivity.Biophysical journal · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The three-dimensional fold of a new protein sequence can often be inferred directly from sequence homology to a protein of known structure. The function of a new protein sequence is more difficult to predict, however, since homologues can have different molecular and cellular functions. To develop and automate computational methods for determining molecular function, we have analyzed ligand-binding specificity in two related families of binding proteins. One of these families includes Escherichia coli lactose repressor and ribose-binding protein, and the other includes E. coli sulfate- and phosphate-binding proteins. These proteins have similar folds but varying specificity, binding many different small molecules, including mono- and disaccharides, purines, oxyanions, ferric iron, and polyamines. Starting from template structural alignments, alignments of over 90 sequences per family were generated by iterative database searches with hidden Markov models. Phylogenetic trees were made of full-length sequences and of subsets of residues lining the binding cleft, to determine whether subbranches of the trees correlate with ligand-binding preference. Automated analyses of residues in the binding pocket were also used to predict ligand-binding function for many uncharacterized database sequences and to identify specific side chain-ligand contacts in proteins without solved structures. Our results demonstrate the utility of anchoring functional annotation within a protein family context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.