Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10736912›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1999

The objective assessment of general practitioners' educational needs: an under-researched area?

P Myers

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Learning needs assessment: assessing the need.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P MyersDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic literature review of the educational needs assessment of general practitioners (GPs) is described. A total of 36 studies, based on the subject of educational needs in primary care, were identified. The methods of searching and the difficulties in identifying papers on the chosen subject are discussed. Although there is an extensive literature on the reporting of the perception of GPs' learning needs, there have been relatively few studies describing their objective evaluation. Seventeen papers on this subject are described, and it was found that questionnaires and structured interviews were the most usual method adopted. There is a case for developing and evaluating a wider range of methods for assessing educational needs in primary care, particularly if the move towards portfolio-based learning is to gain momentum.

Indexed as

Data CollectionEducation, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeNeeds Assessment

Identifiers

PMID10736912
PMCPMC1313400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.