Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10733959›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2000

Comparison of Ca(2+) sparks produced independently by two ryanodine receptor isoforms (type 1 or type 3).

M W Conklin, C A Ahern, P Vallejo, V Sorrentino, H Takeshima, R Coronado

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Sparks and embers of skeletal muscle: the exciting events of contractile activation.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2007
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A "synaptoplasmic cistern" mediates rapid inhibition of cochlear hair cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2004
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M W ConklinDepartment of Physiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
C A Ahern
P Vallejo
V Sorrentino
H Takeshima
R Coronado
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

RYANODINE RECEPTORS AND ACCESSORY PROTEINSP01HL047053 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI MOSS, RICHARD L · 1995 to 2004
$8.5M
DHPR beta subunit and excitation-contraction couplingR01AR046448 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WALKER, JEFFERY W · 2000 to 2006
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL47053NIAMS NIH HHS AR 46448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular determinants of a Ca(2+) spark, those events that determine the sudden opening and closing of a small number of ryanodine receptor (RyR) channels limiting Ca(2+) release to a few milliseconds, are unknown. As a first step we investigated which of two RyR isoforms present in mammalian embryonic skeletal muscle, RyR type 1(RyR-1) or RyR type 3 (RyR-3) has the ability to generate Ca(2+) sparks. Their separate contributions were investigated in intercostal muscle cells of RyR-1 null and RyR-3 null mouse embryos. A comparison of Ca(2+) spark parameters of RyR-1 null versus RyR-3 null cells measured at rest with fluo-3 showed that neither the peak fluorescence intensity (DeltaF/F(o) = 1.25 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.55 +/- 0.6), spatial width at half-max intensity (FWHM = 2.7 +/- 1.2 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.6 microm), nor the duration at half-max intensity (FTHM = 45 +/- 49 vs. 43 +/- 25 ms) was significantly different. Sensitivity to caffeine (0.1 mM) was remarkably different, with sparks in RyR-1 null myotubes becoming brighter and longer in duration, whereas those in RyR-3 null cells remained unchanged. Controls performed in double RyR-1/RyR-3 null cells obtained by mice breeding showed that sparks were not observed in the absence of both isoforms in >150 cells imaged. In conclusion, 1) RyR-1 and RyR-3 appear to be the only intracellular Ca(2+) channels that participate in Ca(2+) spark activity in embryonic skeletal muscle; 2) except in their responsiveness to caffeine, both isoforms have the ability to produce Ca(2+) sparks with nearly identical properties, so it is rather unlikely that a single RyR isoform, when others are also present, would be responsible for Ca(2+) sparks; and 3) because RyR-1 null cells are excitation-contraction (EC) uncoupled and RyR-3 null cells exhibit a normal phenotype, Ca(2+) sparks result from the inherent activity of small clusters of RyRs regardless of the participation of these RyRs in EC coupling.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsCaffeineCalcium SignalingIntercostal MusclesIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMice, KnockoutMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, BiologicalProtein IsoformsRyanodine Receptor Calcium Release ChannelCaffeineProtein IsoformsRyanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel

Identifiers

PMID10733959
PMCPMC1300773
OpenAlexW2030693636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.