Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10731134›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2000

Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes.

G M Rubin, M D Yandell, J R Wortman, G L Gabor Miklos, C R Nelson, I K Hariharan, M E Fortini, P W Li, R Apweiler, W Fleischmann and 40 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 571 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
571citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
77.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

571 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,694 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Species-dependent activities of the PINK1-parkin axis.Translational neurodegeneration · 2026
    Review
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Paralogs of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A Constellation of Fluorescent Biosensors to Illuminate the Galaxy of Protein Kinases.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

511 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

50 authors at 15 institutions in 4 countries.

G M RubinHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
M D Yandell
J R Wortman
G L Gabor Miklos
C R Nelson
I K Hariharan
M E Fortini
P W Li
R Apweiler
W Fleischmann
J M Cherry
S Henikoff
M P Skupski
S Misra
M Ashburner
E Birney
M S Boguski
T Brody
P Brokstein
S E Celniker
S A Chervitz
D Coates
A Cravchik
A Gabrielian
R F Galle
W M Gelbart
R A George
L S Goldstein
F Gong
P Guan
N L Harris
B A Hay
R A Hoskins
J Li
Z Li
R O Hynes
S J Jones
P M Kuehl
B Lemaitre
J T Littleton
D K Morrison
C Mungall
P H O'Farrell
O K Pickeral
C Shue
L B Vosshall
J Zhang
Q Zhao
X H Zheng
S Lewis
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBNational Institutes of Health · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · USCape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRColumbia University · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USPalo Alto University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

FLYBASE: A DROSOPHILA RELATIONAL DATABASEP41HG000739 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI GELBART, WILLIAM MARTIN · 1992 to 2014
$56.6M
TECHNICAL COREP50HG000750 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI PALAZZOLO, MICHAEL J · 1992 to 2002
$25.5M
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DROSOPHILA SYNAPTOTAGMIN FAMILYR01NS040296 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LITTLETON, J. TROY · 2000 to 2024
$7.9M
MOLECULAR DETERMINANTS OF DEVELOPMENTAL FATER01GM037193 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI O'FARRELL, PATRICK H · 1986 to 2009
$4.4M
NITRIC OXIDE AND RESPONSES TO HYPOXIA IN DROSOPHILAR01GM060988 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI O'FARRELL, PATRICK H · 2000 to 2003
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS P4IHG00739NHGRI NIH HHS P50HG00750NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037193NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060988NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae-and the proteins they are predicted to encode-was undertaken in the context of cellular, developmental, and evolutionary processes. The nonredundant protein sets of flies and worms are similar in size and are only twice that of yeast, but different gene families are expanded in each genome, and the multidomain proteins and signaling pathways of the fly and worm are far more complex than those of yeast. The fly has orthologs to 177 of the 289 human disease genes examined and provides the foundation for rapid analysis of some of the basic processes involved in human disease.

Indexed as

GenomeProteomeAnimalsApoptosisBiological EvolutionCaenorhabditis elegansCell AdhesionCell CycleDrosophila melanogasterFungal ProteinsGenes, DuplicateGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetics, MedicalHelminth ProteinsHumansImmunityFungal ProteinsHelminth ProteinsInsect ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID10731134
PMCPMC2754258
OpenAlexW2106013076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.