Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10730576›Full record

ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility1999

Kinetic studies on the effects of ADP and ionic strength on the interaction between myosin subfragment-1 and actin: implications for load-sensitivity and regulation of the crossbridge cycle.

P B Conibear

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P B ConibearDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Leicester, UK. pbc1@le.ac.uk
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics of the interaction of fast skeletal muscle myosin subfragment-1 with pyrene-labelled actin were examined using both stopped-flow and pressure relaxation methods. The data suggest a four-step model i.e.: A + M.(N)(K0)<-->A approximately M.(N)(K1)<-->A - M.(N)(K2)<-->A.M.(N)(K3)<-->A.M.(N)#. ADP weakens the acto-S1 affinity via a reduction in Ko, with no apparent effect on K1 and no effect on K2, whilst k(+2) and k(-2) are both markedly reduced. Increased ionic strength reduces both K0 and k(+2) with no major effect on k(+1). Step 3 represents an extension to previous models and is ADP-dependent. The present work is discussed in relation to earlier studies which led to somewhat different conclusions (Taylor EW (1991) J Biol Chem 266: 294-302; Geeves MA (1989) Biochemistry 28: 5864-5871). It is likely that the interaction proceeds via formation of a disordered complex stabilised by ionic interactions (corresponding to step 0), followed by a disordered-to-ordered transition involving additional hydrophobic contacts (step 1) after which further contacts of both types are made coupled to internal conformational changes (steps 2 and 3). Step 3 could have a role in extending the lifetime of force-generating crossbridges and limiting ATP turnover during contraction against a load, and may be equivalent to a structural change observed in recent cryo-EM studies on the smooth muscle system (Whittaker M, Wilsonkubalek EM, Smith JE, Faust L, Milligan RA and Sweeney HL (1995) Nature 378: 748-751). Cooperative interactions between the two myosin heads also appear to have a role in this putative latch mechanism.

Indexed as

ActinsAdenosine DiphosphateAnimalsKineticsMuscle, SkeletalMyosin SubfragmentsOsmolar ConcentrationRabbitsActinsAdenosine DiphosphateMyosin Subfragments

Identifiers

PMID10730576
OpenAlexW336760737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.