Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10730545›Full record

ReviewDrugs2000

Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors and the treatment of asthma: where are we now and where do we go from here?

M A Giembycz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oral theophylline for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002
    Pooled it
  2. Fibrotic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: from inflammation to fibrosis and therapeutic implications.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Role of PDE8 in T Cell Recruitment and Function in Inflammation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Hesperetin-5,7,3'-Drug design, development and therapy · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M A GiembyczThoracic Medicine, Imperial College of School of Medicine at the National Heart and Lung Institute, London, England. m.giembycz@ic.ac.uk
Lung Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research conducted over the last 20 years has established that inflammation of the airways is central to the airway dysfunction that characterises asthma. Typically, the airway wall is infiltrated by a variety of cells including mast cells, eosinophils and T lymphocytes, which have deviated towards a T(H)2 phenotype. Together, these cells release a plethora of mediators including interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and eotaxin which ultimately cause the histopathology and symptoms of asthma. Glucocorticosteroids are the only drugs currently available that effectively impact upon this inflammation and resolve, to a greater or lesser extent, compromised lung function. However, steroids are nonselective and generally unsuitable for paediatric use. New drugs are clearly required. One group of potential therapeutic agents for asthma are inhibitors of cyclic AMP-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE), of which theophylline may be considered a prototype. It is now known that PDE is a generic term which refers to at least 11 distinct enzyme families that hydrolyse cAMP and/or cGMP. Over the last decade, inhibitors of PDE4 (a cAMP-specific family that negatively regulates the function of almost all pro-inflammatory and immune cells, and exerts widespread anti-inflammatory activity in animal models of asthma) have been developed with the view to reducing the adverse effects profile associated with non-selective inhibitors such as theophylline. Such is the optimism regarding PDE4 as a viable therapeutic target that more than 100 PDE4 inhibitor patent applications have been filed since 1996 by 13 major pharmaceutical companies. This article reviews the progress of PDE4 inhibitors as anti-inflammatory agents, and identifies problems that have been encountered by the pharmaceutical industry in the clinical development of these drugs and what strategies are being considered to overcome them.

Indexed as

3',5'-Cyclic-AMP PhosphodiesterasesAsthmaBiological AvailabilityCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4Drug DesignGenetic VariationHalf-LifeHumansIsoenzymesPhosphodiesterase Inhibitors3',5'-Cyclic-AMP PhosphodiesterasesCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4IsoenzymesPhosphodiesterase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID10730545
OpenAlexW1968206308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.