Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10728912›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology1999

Efficacy of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in clinical decision making for patients with suspected malignant brain tumors.

A Lin, S Bluml, A N Mamelak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of the added value ofNeuro-oncology practice · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. MR spectroscopy in radiation injury.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2009
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Efficacy of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in neurological diagnosis and neurotherapeutic decision making.NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2005
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A LinSpectroscopy Research Unit, Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, CA, USA.
S Bluml
A N Mamelak
Huntington Medical Research Institutes · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We wished to determine the utility of single voxel proton (1H) magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) when used as an alternative or adjunct to brain biopsy in patients harboring lesions suggestive of brain tumors identified by MRI scan. Fifteen patients (age 7-58 years) with MRI scans and clinical histories suggestive of primary brain tumors underwent single voxel 1H-MRS. MRS (16 regions of interest in 15 patients) was used to aid in differentiation between tumor and other pathologies such as stroke or demyelinating plaque (n = 6), radiation necrosis (n = 5), or edema (n = 5). Spectra were quantified to determine absolute molar values of N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), lactate (LAC), and myo-inositol (mI), metabolite ratios relative to Cr were calculated, and spectra were interpreted based on metabolite ratios. Subsequent clinical management was based on MRS interpretation, and patients were then followed to determine if MRS interpretation accurately predicted clinical outcome or surgical findings. Mean follow-up was 12.5 months (range 3-28 months). MRS suggested the presence of recurrent tumor in 7 cases, all of which were subsequently 'confirmed' by tumor resection (n = 4) or disease progression (n = 3). MRS suggested the presence of new tumor in 1 case, subsequently confirmed by surgical resection. MRS suggested the presence of necrosis in 3 patients; all 3 remained radiographically stable during the follow-up period, and one was confirmed by stereotactic biopsy. MRS suggested non-neoplastic lesions in 4 cases, 3 of whom were followed until radiographic resolution of lesions and one of which was confirmed as a pyogenic abscess via stereotactic aspiration. Overall, MRS accurately predicted the pathological nature and clinical outcome of lesions in 15/16 (96%) situations, influenced clinical decision making in 12 cases, and altered surgery planning in 7 patients. In appropriate circumstances MRS can reduce the need for biopsy, and provide an important guide for clinical decision-making in difficult cases.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyAdultBiopsyBrainBrain NeoplasmsChildDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProtonsRadiation InjuriesReoperationProtons

Identifiers

PMID10728912
OpenAlexW305773089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.