ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics1999
Cellular pharmacokinetics: effects of cytoplasmic diffusion and binding on organ transit time distribution.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatocellular necrosis, fibrosis and microsomal activity determine the hepatic pharmacokinetics of basic drugs in right-heart-failure-induced liver damage.Pharmaceutical research · 2012Article
- Drug structure-transport relationships.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2010Review
- Residence time dispersion as a general measure of drug distribution kinetics: estimation and physiological interpretation.Pharmaceutical research · 2007Article
- Cytoplasmic binding and disposition kinetics of diclofenac in the isolated perfused rat liver.British journal of pharmacology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distribution between well-stirred compartments is the classical paradigm in pharmacokinetics. Also in capillary-issue exchange modeling a barrier-limited approach is mostly adopted. As a consequence of tissue binding, however, drug distribution cannot be regarded as instantaneous even at the cellular level and the distribution process consists of at least two components: transmembrane exchange and cytoplasmic transport. Two concepts have been proposed for the cytoplasmic distribution process of hydrophobic or amphipathic molecules, (i) slowing of diffusion due to instantaneous binding to immobile cellular structures and (ii) slow binding after instantaneous distribution throughout the cytosol. The purpose of this study was to develop a general approach for comparing both models using a stochastic model of intra- and extravascular drug distribution. Criteria for model discrimination are developed using the first three central moments (mean, variance, and skewness) of the cellular residence time and organ transit time distribution, respectively. After matching the models for the relative dispersion the remaining differences in relative skewness are predicted, discussing the relative roles of membrane permeability, cellular binding and cytoplasmic transport. It is shown under which conditions the models are indistinguishable on the basis of venous organ outflow concentration-time curves. The relative dispersion of cellular residence times is introduced as a model-independent measure of cytoplasmic equilibration kinetics, which indicates whether diffusion through the cytoplasm is rate limiting. If differences in outflow curve shapes (their relative skewness) cannot be detected, independent information on binding and/or diffusion kinetics is necessary to avoid model misspecification. The method is applied to previously published hepatic outflow data of enalaprilat, triiodothyronine, and diclofenac. It provides a general framework for the modeling of cellular pharmacokinetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10728488What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.