Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10728271›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal1998

How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies.

S A Dobie, L M Baldwin, R A Rosenblatt, M A Fordyce, C H Andrilla, L G Hart

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Post-disaster reproductive health outcomes.Maternal and child health journal · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Regional differences in autism and intellectual disability risk associated with cesarean section delivery.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Perinatal characteristics and retinoblastoma.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2012
    Article
  19. History of the birth certificate: from inception to the future of electronic data.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S A DobieUniversity of Washington, Department of Family Medicine, Seattle 98195-6390, USA. dob@u.washington.edu
L M Baldwin
R A Rosenblatt
M A Fordyce
C H Andrilla
L G Hart

Funding

PRACTICE VARIATIONS IN PRENATAL AND INTRAPARTUM CARER01HS006166 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ROSENBLATT, ROGER · 1989 to 1991
–
AHRQ HHS R01 HSO6166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBirth certificates are a major source of population-based data on maternal and perinatal health, but their value depends on the accuracy of the data. This study assesses the validity of information recorded on the birth certificates for women in Washington State who were considered to be low risk at entry into care.

methodsBirth certificates were matched to data abstracted from prenatal and intrapartum clinic and hospital records of a sample of 1937 Washington State obstetrical patients who were considered to be low risk at the beginning of their pregnancies. Accuracy of a variety of pregnancy characteristics (e.g., complications, procedures) on the birth certificate was analyzed using percentage agreement and sensitivity with record abstracts as the "gold standard." Next, we weighted the data from each source to produce estimates of pregnancy characteristics in the population. We compared these estimates from the two data sources to see whether they provide similar pictures of this subpopulation.

resultsMissing data for specific items on the birth certificates ranged from 0% to 24%. The birth certificate accurately captured gravidity and parity, but was less likely to report prenatal and intrapartum complications. The population estimates of the two data sources were significantly different.

conclusionsBecause birth certificates significantly underestimated the complications of pregnancies, number of interventions, number of procedures, and prenatal visits, use of these data for health policy development or resource allocation should be tempered with caution.

Indexed as

Birth CertificatesAdultData CollectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMedical RecordsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareReproducibility of ResultsReproductive HistoryWashington

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.