ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2000
The role of adenosine receptors in the action of theophylline on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy and asthmatic subjects.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational discovery of novel inhibitory candidates targeting versatile transcriptional repressor MBD2.Journal of molecular modeling · 2022Article
- Carotenoids: Therapeutic Strategy in the Battle against Viral Emerging Diseases, COVID-19: An Overview.Preventive nutrition and food science · 2021Review
- Shaping of monocyte and macrophage function by adenosine receptors.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2007Review
- Progress in the pursuit of therapeutic adenosine receptor antagonists.Medicinal research reviews · 2006Review
- Review
- New clinical applications of xanthine derivatives: modulatory actions on leukocyte survival and function.International journal of hematology · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of adenosine A2b receptors in the anti-proliferative action of theophylline in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (HPBMC) from healthy and asthmatic subjects. 2. Theophylline significantly inhibited PHA-induced proliferation of HPBMC from both healthy and asthmatic donors but only at relatively high concentrations at 1 mM (P<0.05). Enprophylline, a drug which also acts as a non-selective phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor and is a selective A2b receptor antagonist, had no significant effect on proliferation of cells from either group at concentrations up to 10 microM (P>0.05; n=6). 3. Adenosine deaminase (2 u ml(-1)), which metabolizes adenosine, had no significant effect on PHA-induced HPBMC proliferation over a range of concentrations (0 - 8 microg ml(-1)) in cells from either healthy or asthmatic subjects. 4. The adenosine receptor agonists N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, A1-selective) and 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA, A1/A2) produced a small but significant inhibition of PHA-induced proliferation of HPBMC from healthy and asthmatic subjects (10 microM, P<0.05; n=6). In contrast, 5'-N-ethylcarboxamido-2-[4-(2-]carboxyethyl)phenethyl]adenosine (CGS21680, A2a-selective) was without significant effect (P>0.05; n=6). 5. The adenosine receptor antagonist alloxazine (A2b-selective) had no significant effect, while 8(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine,(CSC, A2a-selective) significantly inhibited PHA-induced proliferation of HPBMC from both groups (P<0.05; n=6). 6. Our results suggest that endogenous or exogenous adenosine has little effect on the proliferation of HPBMC obtained from healthy or asthmatic subjects. Thus it would appear that the effect of high concentrations of theophylline is not related to adenosine receptor antagonism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.