Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10724453›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2000

B-chromosome evolution.

J P Camacho, T F Sharbel, L W Beukeboom

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 215 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
215citing papers in PubMed
24.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

215 citing papers in PubMed, 646 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The evolutionary genomics of meiotic drive.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The enigma of the B chromosome-specific behaviour.Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Neo-X-Linked Chromosome Polymorphism: Cytogenetic Insights fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

155 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

J P CamachoDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, Spain. jpmcamac@ugr.es
T F Sharbel
L W Beukeboom
Bruker (United States) · USMax Planck Society · DEUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B chromosomes are extra chromosomes to the standard complement that occur in many organisms. They can originate in a number of ways including derivation from autosomes and sex chromosomes in intra- and interspecies crosses. Their subsequent molecular evolution resembles that of univalent sex chromosomes, which involves gene silencing, heterochromatinization and the accumulation of repetitive DNA and transposons. B-chromosome frequencies in populations result from a balance between their transmission rates and their effects on host fitness. Their long-term evolution is considered to be the outcome of selection on the host genome to eliminate B chromosomes or suppress their effects and on the B chromosome's ability to escape through the generation of new variants. Because B chromosomes interact with the standard chromosomes, they can play an important role in genome evolution and may be useful for studying molecular evolutionary processes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChromosomesGenetic VariationAnimals

Identifiers

PMID10724453
PMCPMC1692730
OpenAlexW2135416390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.