Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10720357›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Implementation of rules based computerised bedside prescribing and administration: intervention study.

P G Nightingale, D Adu, N T Richards, M Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Impact of non-interruptive medication laboratory monitoring alerts in ambulatory care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prospective, controlled study of an intervention to reduce errors in neonatal antibiotic orders.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2015
    Article
  19. Assessment of legibility and completeness of handwritten and electronic prescriptions.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2014
    Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P G NightingaleWolfson Computer Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham B15 2TH. P.G.Nightingale@bham.ac.uk
D Adu
N T Richards
M Peters

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo implement and assess a rules based computerised prescribing system with the aim of improving the safety of prescriptions and the administration of drugs.

designAnalysis of performance of computerised system plus questionnaire survey of users.

setting64 bed renal unit in a teaching hospital.

intervention: Introduction of the system into routine clinical use.

main outcome measuresNumber of attempted prescriptions cancelled by the system; proportion of warning messages overridden; users' comparisons of the system with conventional procedures.

resultsBetween October 1998 and August 1999 the system cancelled 58 (0.07%) out of 87 789 prescriptions on the grounds of clinical safety. In addition, 427 (57%) attempted prescriptions generating high level warnings and 1257 (8%) generating low level warnings were not completed. In a user survey 82% (31/38) of doctors and nurses considered the system to be an improvement on conventional procedures.

conclusionsThe system has contributed to safety and patient care. All prescriptions are complete and legible, and transcription errors have been eliminated. The system assists clinicians when they are writing a prescription by making available information on patients. The system supports clinical decision making and has been well received by doctors, nurses, and pharmacists.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsDrug Therapy, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansKidney DiseasesMaleMedication ErrorsMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID10720357
PMCPMC27317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.