Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10713908›Full record

ReviewHerz2000

Genetic risk factors and restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions.

A Kastrati, J Dirschinger, A Schömig

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A comparative study of restenosis rates in bare metal and drug-eluting stents.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2010
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Long-term outcome after coronary stenting.Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A KastratiDeutsches Herzzentrum München. kastrati@dhm.mhn.de
J Dirschinger
A Schömig
Deutsches Herzzentrum München · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restenosis is the major limitation of percutaneous coronary interventions. Depending on the form of intervention and patients' characteristics, 20 to 50% of the treated patients incur significant restenosis. Restenosis is caused by a complex and only partially understood cascade of events. Thrombus formation at the injury site, formation of the neointima as a result of the migration and proliferation of smooth muscle cells (SMC) and extracellular matrix production, as well as constrictive remodeling of the vessel wall contribute by a variable degree to restenosis. Restenosis is not a random event but it affects selectively a certain subset of patients. These patients have some peculiar characteristics that help to identify the presence of a higher risk for restenosis. Conventional patient-related factors account only for a relatively small portion of the predictive power, much more contribution comes from lesion and procedural characteristics. There is increasing evidence that inherited factors may explain at least part of the excessive risk for restenosis observed in certain patients. Evidence exists that gene polymorphisms may lead to quantitative or functional alterations of the respective gene products. Recent studies have also found significant associations between several polymorphic alleles encoding for proteins with a relevant role in the process of lumen renarrowing and restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions. The best studied polymorphisms in this regard are those of the genes encoding for angiotensin-converting enzyme and platelet glycoprotein-IIIa. Completed or ongoing studies have focused on polymorphisms of genes encoding for proteins interfering with lipid metabolism, hemostasis, nitric oxide production, inflammatory mechanisms, SMC proliferation and matrix production. The results of this research will have considerable pathophysiological and therapeutical implications for the battle against restenosis.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryStentsCoronary DiseaseGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPolymorphism, GeneticRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID10713908
OpenAlexW161202508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.