Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10713677›Full record

ArticleOncogene2000

Two mutations affecting conserved residues in the Met receptor operate via different mechanisms.

D Maritano, P Accornero, N Bonifaci, C Ponzetto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Removal of substrate inhibition ofFood chemistry: X · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Initial clinical sensitivity and acquired resistance to MET inhibition in MET-mutated papillary renal cell carcinoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Structural characterization of autoinhibited c-Met kinase produced by coexpression in bacteria with phosphatase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D MaritanoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Amedeo Avogadro University, Novara, Italy.
P Accornero
N Bonifaci
C Ponzetto
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have investigated the mechanism by which two oncogenic mutations (M1268T and D1246H/N; Amino-acids are numbered according to Schmidt et al., 1999) affecting conserved residues in the catalytic domain of the Met receptor, activate its transforming potential. Both mutations were previously found in tumorigenic forms of the Ret and Kit receptors, respectively. The mutated residues are located either in the P+1 loop (M) or within the activation loop (A-loop) (D), which in a number of receptor tyrosine kinases harbors a pair of tandem tyrosines (Y1252-1253 in Met). Ligand-induced dimerization promotes their phosphorylation, and locks the A-loop into an open conformation. When unphosphorylated, the tandem tyrosines inhibit enzymatic activity by blocking the active site. Upon Y-->F mutation of Y1252-1253, neither ligand binding nor Tpr-mediated dimerization can release this block. Here we show that the M1268T mutation partially rescues the kinase activity (and the transforming ability) of the Y1252-1253F Tpr-Met mutant, but is completely dependent on dimerization for its effect. In contrast, the two D1246H/N mutants strictly depend on Y1252-1253 for activity. Surprisingly, however, they constitutively activate the isolated cytoplasmic TK domain of Met (Cyto-Met). These data indicate that the two mutations operate via distinct mechanisms.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceDrosophila ProteinsMutationAmino Acid SequenceCell Transformation, NeoplasticDimerizationLigandsNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsPhosphorylationProtein ConformationProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesDrosophila ProteinsLigandsNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesRet protein, DrosophilaTPR protein, human

Identifiers

PMID10713677
OpenAlexW2325250004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.