Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10713159›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2000

Architectural transcription factors and the SAGA complex function in parallel pathways to activate transcription.

Y Yu, P Eriksson, D J Stillman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y YuDivision of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.
P Eriksson
D J Stillman
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work has shown that transcription of the yeast HO gene involves the sequential recruitment of a series of transcription factors. We have performed a functional analysis of HO regulation by determining the ability of mutations in SIN1, SIN3, RPD3, and SIN4 negative regulators to permit HO expression in the absence of certain activators. Mutations in the SIN1 (=SPT2) gene do not affect HO regulation, in contrast to results of other studies using an HO:lacZ reporter, and our data show that the regulatory properties of an HO:lacZ reporter differ from that of the native HO gene. Mutations in SIN3 and RPD3, which encode components of a histone deacetylase complex, show the same pattern of genetic suppression, and this suppression pattern differs from that seen in a sin4 mutant. The Sin4 protein is present in two transcriptional regulatory complexes, the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme/mediator and the SAGA histone acetylase complex. Our genetic analysis allows us to conclude that Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complex has multiple roles in HO activation, and the data suggest that the ability of the SBF transcription factor to bind to the HO promoter may be affected by the acetylation state of the HO promoter. We also demonstrate that the Nhp6 architectural transcription factor, encoded by the redundant NHP6A and NHP6B genes, is required for HO expression. Suppression analysis with sin3, rpd3, and sin4 mutations suggests that Nhp6 and Gcn5 have similar functions. A gcn5 nhp6a nhp6b triple mutant is extremely sick, suggesting that the SAGA complex and the Nhp6 architectural transcription factors function in parallel pathways to activate transcription. We find that disruption of SIN4 allows this strain to grow at a reasonable rate, indicating a critical role for Sin4 in detecting structural changes in chromatin mediated by Gcn5 and Nhp6. These studies underscore the critical role of chromatin structure in regulating HO gene expression.

Indexed as

Repressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional ActivationAcetyltransferasesChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, ReporterHistone AcetyltransferasesHistone DeacetylasesHMGN ProteinsAcetyltransferasesChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsGCN5 protein, S cerevisiaeHistone AcetyltransferasesHistone DeacetylasesHMGN ProteinsHO protein, S cerevisiaeMediator ComplexNHP6A protein, S cerevisiaeNHP6B protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear Proteinsp300-CBP-Associated FactorProtein KinasesRepressor ProteinsRNA Polymerase IIRPD3 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSAGA protein, Emericella nidulansSCEI protein, S cerevisiaeSIN3 protein, S cerevisiaeSIN4 protein, S cerevisiaeSPT2 protein, S cerevisiaeTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID10713159
PMCPMC85404
OpenAlexW2140108688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.