Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10712500›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology of the cell2000

Half a century of "the nuclear matrix".

T Pederson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology of the cell, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Role of RNA in genome folding: It's all about affinity.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome folding through loop extrusion by SMC complexes.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Architectural RNA in chromatin organization.Biochemical Society transactions · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Seq'ing identity and function in a repeat-derived noncoding RNA world.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

T PedersonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA. thoru.pederson@umassmed.edu

Funding

RNA PROCESSING AND RIBONUCLEOPROTEINR01GM021595 · NIGMS · WORCESTER FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI PEDERSON, THORU · 1985 to 2001
$886k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-21595-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cell fraction that would today be termed "the nuclear matrix" was first described and patented in 1948 by Russian investigators. In 1974 this fraction was rediscovered and promoted as a fundamental organizing principle of eukaryotic gene expression. Yet, convincing evidence for this functional role of the nuclear matrix has been elusive and has recently been further challenged. What do we really know about the nonchromatin elements (if any) of internal nuclear structure? Are there objective reasons (as opposed to thinly veiled disdain) to question experiments that use harsh nuclear extraction steps and precipitation-prone conditions? Are the known biophysical properties of the nucleoplasm in vivo consistent with the existence of an extensive network of anastomosing filaments coursing dendritically throughout the interchromatin space? To what extent may the genome itself contribute information for its own quarternary structure in the interphase nucleus? These questions and recent work that bears on the mystique of the nuclear matrix are addressed in this essay. The degree to which gene expression literally depends on nonchromatin nuclear structure as a facilitating organizational format remains an intriguing but unsolved issue in eukaryotic cell biology, and considerable skepticism continues to surround the nuclear matrix fraction as an accurate representation of the in vivo situation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportCell NucleusChromatinHumansNuclear MatrixRNA, NuclearSubcellular FractionsChromatinRNA, Nuclear

Identifiers

PMID10712500
PMCPMC14811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.