Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10712219›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2000

Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data.

M S McPeek, L Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Genetic studies of stuttering in a founder population.Journal of fluency disorders · 2007
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A genome-wide quantitative trait locus (QTL) linkage scan of NEO personality factors in Latino families segregating bipolar disorder.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2017
    Article
  17. Sex-specific linkage scans in opioid dependence.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2017
    Article
  18. HYSYS: have you swapped your samples?Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Genome-wide significant loci for addiction and anxiety.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2016
    Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M S McPeekDepartment of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. mcpeek@galton.uchicago.edu
L Sun

Funding

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF COMMON DISEASES: AN EVALUATIONR01GM031575 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY · PI ALMASY, LAURA A. · 1985 to 2016
$7.8M
Methods for Human Genetic MappingR01HG001645 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MCPEEK, MARY SARA · 2003 to 2023
$6.8M
METHODS FOR HUMAN GENETIC LINKAGE MAPPINGR29HG001645 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MCPEEK, MARY SARA · 1997 to 2001
$126k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG01645NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG001645NHGRI NIH HHS R29 HG001645NIGMS NIH HHS GM31575NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Misspecified relationships can have serious consequences for linkage studies, resulting in either reduced power or false-positive evidence for linkage. If some individuals in the pedigree are untyped, then Mendelian errors may not be observed. Previous approaches to detection of misspecified relationships by use of genotype data were developed for sib and half-sib pairs. We extend the likelihood calculations of Göring and Ott and Boehnke and Cox to more-general relative pairs, for which identity-by-descent (IBD) status is no longer a Markov chain, and we propose a likelihood-ratio test. We also extend the identity-by-state (IBS)-based test of Ehm and Wagner to nonsib relative pairs. The likelihood-ratio test has high power, but its drawbacks include the need to construct and apply a separate Markov chain for each possible alternative relationship and the need for simulation to assess significance. The IBS-based test is simpler but has lower power. We propose two new test statistics-conditional expected IBD (EIBD) and adjusted IBS (AIBS)-designed to retain the simplicity of IBS while increasing power by taking into account chance sharing. In simulations, the power of EIBD is generally close to that of the likelihood-ratio test. The power of AIBS is higher than that of IBS, in all cases considered. We suggest a strategy of initial screening by use of EIBD and AIBS, followed by application of the likelihood-ratio test to only a subset of relative pairs, identified by use of EIBD and AIBS. We apply the methods to a Genetic Analysis Workshop 11 data set from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingGenome, HumanAlcoholismAllelesChromosome MappingComputer SimulationConsanguinityFemaleGene FrequencyGenotypeHumansLikelihood FunctionsMaleMarkov ChainsMatched-Pair AnalysisMicrosatellite Repeats

Identifiers

PMID10712219
PMCPMC1288143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.