Updated New Zealand cardiovascular disease risk-benefit prediction guide.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

1. Impact of provision of cardiovascular disease risk estimates to healthcare professionals and patients: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2015
   Pooled it
2. Accuracy and impact of risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2006
   Pooled it
3. Framingham-based tools to calculate the global risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review of tools for clinicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2003
   Pooled it
4. Prediction of mortality from coronary heart disease among diverse populations: is there a common predictive function?Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2002
   Pooled it
5. Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India.BMC public health · 2018
   Trial
6. Prevention of cardiovascular diseases: focus on modifiable cardiovascular risk.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2006
   Trial
7. Doxazosin versus bendrofluazide: a comparison of the metabolic effects in British South Asians with hypertension.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
   Trial
8. Controlled trial of effect of documented cardiovascular risk scores on prescribing.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003
   Trial
9. Individualised multifactorial lifestyle intervention trial for high-risk cardiovascular patients in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
   Trial
10. Contemporary Review of Risk Scores in Prediction of Coronary and Cardiovascular Deaths.Current cardiology reports · 2022
    Review
11. Predictive biomarkers of cardiovascular disease in adult Canadian population.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2021
    Article
12. Cardiovascular Risk Estimates in Ten Years in the Brazilian Population, a Population-Based Study.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021
    Article
13. Management of High Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetic Patients: Focus on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Appropriate Drug Use in General Practice.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Article
14. GPs' familiarity with and use of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules: a UK survey study.BJGP open · 2020
    Article
15. Understanding Vascular Age: Are Clinical scoring systems useful for Early Vascular Aging Syndrome Prediction ?High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Observational
16. Cardiovascular disease risk perception in a Hungarian community sample: psychometric evaluation of the ABCD Risk Perception Questionnaire.BMJ open · 2020
    Observational
17. Vitamin D assays and the definition of hypovitaminosis D: results from the First International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018
    Review
18. Association Between Work-Related Stress and Coronary Heart Disease: A Review of Prospective Studies Through the Job Strain, Effort-Reward Balance, and Organizational Justice Models.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018
    Review
19. Greater ability to express positive emotion is associated with lower projected cardiovascular disease risk.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2017
    Article
20. Global Risk Assessment to Guide Blood Pressure Management in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2017
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Guidelines on preventing cardiovascular disease in clinical practice.2000
• Erratum issued

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as