ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000
Estimating cardiovascular risk for primary prevention: outstanding questions for primary care.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of optimal cardiovascular screening activities and associated factors among apparently healthy school teachers in Kota Bharu, Kelantan.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2018Article
- Socio-medical Characteristics of Coronary Disease in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the World.Materia socio-medica · 2011Article
- Carotid intima-media thickness measurements: techniques and clinical relevance.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2008Review
- Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: research issues and directions for future research.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2005Review
- Implementation of a pharmacist-led clinic for hypertensive patients in primary care--a pilot study.Pharmacy world & science : PWS · 2005Article
- Comparison of methods to identify individuals at increased risk of coronary disease from the general population.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Article
- [Is there a relationship between the assessment of coronary risk on the Framingham and Sheffield tables and the sixth report of the Joint National Committee? Relationship between tables of coronary risk].Atencion primaria · 2003Article
- Primary prevention of coronary heart disease.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Article
- Using disease risk estimates to guide risk factor interventions: field test of a patient workbook for self-assessing coronary risk.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2002Article
- Ethnic minorities have specific needs with regard to cardiovascular risk.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- Guidelines on preventing cardiovascular disease in clinical practice.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.