Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10710579›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Risk assessment in primary prevention of coronary heart disease: randomised comparison of three scoring methods.

C G Isles, L D Ritchie, P Murchie, J Norrie

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Fremantle Primary Prevention Study: a multicentre randomised trial of absolute cardiovascular risk reduction.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Assessment of cardiovascular risk.Current hypertension reports · 2010
    Review
  8. Perceptions of risk: understanding cardiovascular disease.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Using disease risk estimates to guide risk factor interventions: field test of a patient workbook for self-assessing coronary risk.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2002
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Management of UTI in general practice: a cost effective analysis. A commentary to facilitate an understanding of economic evaluation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
  15. Statins and the prevention of coronary heart disease: striking a balance that is desirable, affordable, and achievable.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
  16. The primary prevention of coronary heart disease with statins: practice headache or public health?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C G IslesMedical Unit, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries DG1 4AP.
L D Ritchie
P Murchie
J Norrie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseHumansNurse PractitionersPhysicians, FamilyPrimary Health CareRisk AssessmentSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID10710579
PMCPMC27313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.