Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10706531›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2000

Strain differences in vaginal responses to the xenoestrogen bisphenol A.

X Long, R Steinmetz, N Ben-Jonathan, A Caperell-Grant, P C Young, K P Nephew, R M Bigsby

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic variation in sensitivity to estrogens and breast cancer risk.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A review of the carcinogenic potential of bisphenol A.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

X LongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5196, USA.
R Steinmetz
N Ben-Jonathan
A Caperell-Grant
P C Young
K P Nephew
R M Bigsby
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University Bloomington · USLaboratoire d’immunologie intégrative du cancer · FR

Funding

TAMOXIFEN AND RETINOIC ACID EFFECT ON THE UTERUSR29CA074748 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI NEPHEW, KENNETH P · 1996 to 2000
$94k
PARACRINE REGULATION OF PITUITARY LACTOTROPHSR01NS013243 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI BEN-JONATHAN, NIRA · 1985 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS CA74748NINDS NIH HHS NS13243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) is the monomer component of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins; human exposure derives from leachate in foodstuffs packaged in certain plastics or from epoxy-based dental appliances. BPA stimulates prolactin secretion in Fischer 344 (F344) rats but not in Sprague-Dawley (S-D) rats. The present studies were performed to determine if another classic estrogen target tissue, the rat vagina, responds to BPA in a strain-specific manner. In F344 rats BPA increased DNA synthesis in vaginal epithelium with a median effective dose (ED(50)) of 37.5 mg/kg body weight; DNA synthesis was not stimulated in S-D rats by any dose tested. Clearance of (3)H-BPA from blood followed the same time course in both strains of rats, with a half-life of 90 min. Scatchard analysis of [(3)H]estradiol binding showed no strain differences in concentration or affinity of the vaginal estrogen receptor. BPA increased the level of mRNA for the immediate early gene, c-fos, with similar dose-response curves in both rat strains. Thus, F344 and S-D rats exhibit differences in sensitivity to BPA at the level of cell proliferation in the vaginal epithelium. However, metabolic clearance of BPA and the early events that lead to the proliferative response, receptor-ligand interaction and induction of immediate early genes, show no strain differences. These observations suggest that differences in intermediate effects must account for the difference in sensitivity of the proliferative response to the xenoestrogen. Furthermore, these results point to the need for caution in choosing a suitable end point and animal model when seeking to test the estrogenic effects of xenobiotics.

Indexed as

Rats, Inbred F344Rats, Sprague-DawleyAnimalsBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsCell DivisionDNA ReplicationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEnvironmental PollutantsEpitheliumEstrogens, Non-SteroidalFemaleGenes, fosHumansMetabolic Clearance RateBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A CompoundsEnvironmental PollutantsEstrogens, Non-SteroidalPhenolsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID10706531
PMCPMC1637966
OpenAlexW1973556480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.