Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10704512›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2000

Peripheral odor coding in the rat and frog: quality and intensity specification.

P Duchamp-Viret, A Duchamp, M A Chaput

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Recalibrating Olfactory Neuroscience to the Range of Naturally Occurring Odor Concentrations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  4. Ex Vivo Multisite Electro-olfactogram Recordings in Rabbit Neonates.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biological constraints on configural odour mixture perception.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Simultaneous Loss of NCKX4 and CNG Channel Desensitization Impairs Olfactory Sensitivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A model for non-monotonic intensity coding.Royal Society open science · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Mechanisms underlying odorant-induced and spontaneous calcium signals in olfactory receptor neurons of spiny lobsters, Panulirus argus.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P Duchamp-ViretLaboratoire de Neurosciences et Systèmes Sensoriels, Unité Mixte de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France. pdchamp@olfac.univlyon1.fr
A Duchamp
M A Chaput

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammals, two recent studies have shown recently that one odor molecule can be recognized by several molecular olfactory receptors (ORs), and a single OR can recognize multiple odor molecules. In addition, one olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) may respond to different stimuli chosen as representative of distinct odor qualities. The aim of the present study was to analyze quality and intensity coding abilities of rat single ORNs, comparing them with previous extensive data gathered in the frog to get insight into the generality of olfactory coding mechanisms over vertebrates. Response properties of 90 rat ORNs to different odors or to one odor at different concentrations were analyzed. In the rat and the frog, odor quality appears to be specified through the identity of activated ORNs. However, rat ORNs have higher response thresholds. This lower sensitivity may be interpreted as an increase in selectivity of rat ORNs for low or medium odor intensities. In these conditions, the lower proportion of activated ORNs could be counterbalanced by their number, as well as by their higher glomerular convergence ratio in the olfactory bulb. From amphibians to mammals, the olfactory system appears to use universal mechanisms based on a combinatorial-coding mode that may allow quasi-infinite possibilities of adaptation to various olfactory environments.

Indexed as

OdorantsAction PotentialsAnimalsAnuraDiscrimination LearningElectrophysiologyOlfactory Receptor NeuronsRatsRats, WistarReceptors, OdorantSmellSpecies SpecificityStimulation, ChemicalReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID10704512
PMCPMC6772510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.