ArticleOncogene2000
Dominant action of mutated erythropoietin receptors on differentiation in vitro and erythroleukemia development in vivo.
Article in Oncogene, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of erythropoietin on normal and neoplastic cells.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
J2E cells produce rapid, fatal erythroleukemias in vivo but still respond to erythropoietin (epo) in vitro by differentiating, proliferating and remaining viable in the absence of serum. Mutant epo receptors were introduced into these cells to determine whether they could influence the different biological responses to epo in vitro and the development of erythroleukemias. Three mutant receptors were used as cytoplasmic truncation mutants Delta257 and Delta321 (above box 1 and below box 2 respectively), and the cytoplasmic point mutant W282R (defective for JAK2 activation). Strikingly, the Delta321 mutation produced a hyper-sensitive response in vitro to epo-induced differentiation and viability, but not to proliferation. In contrast with the Delta321 receptor, the Delta257 and W282R mutants inhibited all biological responses to epo due to impaired JAK2 phosphorylation. Significantly, erythroleukemias took almost twice as long to develop with cells containing the W282R mutation, indicating that JAK2 plays an important role in the emergence of these leukemias. These data demonstrate that mutant epo receptors dominantly altered responses of J2E cells to epo in culture and the development of erythroleukemias. Oncogene (2000) 19, 953 - 960.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.