Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10699023›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2000

Rapid, efficient detection and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum by microscopic observation of broth cultures. The Tuberculosis Working Group in Peru.

L Caviedes, T S Lee, R H Gilman, P Sheen, E Spellman, E H Lee, D E Berg, S Montenegro-James

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 276 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis detection, Latvia.Emerging infectious diseases · 2005
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Dissecting rifampicin heteroresistance inJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. QuantitativeJournal of clinical microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Clinically encountered growth phenotypes of tuberculosis-causing bacilli and theirFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Isoniazid Preventive Therapy in Contacts of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

L CaviedesDepartment of Pathology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Medicina y Agricultura (AB PRISMA), Lima, Peru.
T S Lee
R H Gilman
P Sheen
E Spellman
E H Lee
D E Berg
S Montenegro-James
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEPrisma · PEOchsner Medical Center · USStony Brook University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inexpensive, rapid, and reliable methods of detecting infection by and drug susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) are crucial to the control of tuberculosis. The novel microscopic observation broth-drug susceptibility assay (MODS) detects early growth of MTB in liquid medium, allowing more timely diagnosis and drug susceptibility testing. Sputum samples from hospitalized patients in Peru were analyzed by using stains, culture, and PCR. Sensitivity of MODS (92%) compared favorably with the most sensitive of the other culture methods (93%). Sputum samples positive for tuberculosis were tested for susceptibility to isoniazid and rifampin with the microwell alamar blue assay (MABA) and MODS. In 89% of cases, there was concordance between MODS and MABA. Of the diagnostic and susceptibility testing methods used, MODS yielded results most rapidly (median, 9.0 and 9.5 days, respectively). MODS is a rapid, inexpensive, sensitive, and specific method for MTB detection and susceptibility testing; it is particularly appropriate for use in developing countries burdened by significant infection rates and increasing numbers of multiple-drug-resistant cases.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsBacterial Typing TechniquesCosts and Cost AnalysisDrug Resistance, MicrobialHumansInpatientsIsoniazidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisPeruPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsRifampinSensitivity and SpecificitySputumTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsIsoniazidRifampin

Identifiers

PMID10699023
PMCPMC86377
OpenAlexW2143351205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.