Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10698980›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2000

Accelerated detection and identification of mycobacteria with MGIT 960 and COBAS AMPLICOR systems.

M L Katila, P Katila, R Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Early detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in BACTEC MGIT cultures using nucleic acid amplification.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2016
    Article
  6. [Identification ofZhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2016
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M L KatilaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. marja-leena.katila@kuh.fi
P Katila
R Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An automated cultivation system for mycobacteria, the MGIT 960 system (MGIT system), was compared in the clinical routine with two variants of Löwenstein-Jensen (L-J) medium. A total of 152 isolates were recovered from 2,015 specimens: 139 (91%) with the MGIT system and 127 (84%) with L-J media (P = 0.05). These included 68 isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, of which 88% grew in the MGIT system and 93% grew in L-J media (P = 0.389), and 84 isolates of mycobacteria other than M. tuberculosis (MOTT), of which 94% grew in the MGIT system and 76% grew in L-J media (P = 0.003). More M. avium complex isolates were detected in the MGIT system (n = 65) than in L-J media (n = 50) (P = 0.001). Growth in the MGIT system was detected in 2 weeks for 78% of the isolates, whereas growth was detected in the two L-J media for 17 and 25% of the isolates, respectively. The mean times to detection of M. tuberculosis were 12 days in the MGIT system and 20 days in L-J media, and for M. avium complex the mean times to detection were 8 and 22 to 25 days, respectively. The contamination rates were similar (8.7 to 8.9%) in all media. A commercial amplification system (COBAS AMPLICOR) was evaluated for its ability to rapidly identify M. tuberculosis, M. avium, and M. intracellulare directly from 393 samples in MGIT system broth. A correct PCR result, as evaluated by culture or clinical data, was obtained for 96% of the samples, with inhibition being detected for 2% of the samples. Of the 89 results positive for M. tuberculosis, 91% were regarded as true positive, 8% were regarded as inconclusive, and 2% were considered false positive. For results positive for M. avium and M. intracellulare, 97 and 79%, respectively, were regarded as true positive. Increased rapidity and enhanced isolation of MOTT were obtained with the MGIT system. COBAS AMPLICOR was suitable for rapid identification of these three common pathogens from MGIT system broth.

Indexed as

AutomationBacterial Typing TechniquesBacteriological TechniquesCulture MediaFecesHumansMycobacteriumMycobacterium avium ComplexMycobacterium InfectionsMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionQuality ControlTime FactorsUrineCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID10698980
PMCPMC86313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.