Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10698882›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Demand for and supply of out of hours care from general practitioners in England and Scotland: observational study based on routinely collected data.

C Salisbury, M Trivella, S Bruster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Agreement between triage category and patient's perception of priority in emergency departments.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Out-of-hours care: do we?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Apprehensive parents: a qualitative study of parents seeking immediate primary care for their children.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Does distance matter? Geographical variation in GP out-of-hours service use: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C SalisburyDivision of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol BS8 2PR. c.salisbury@bristol.ac.uk
M Trivella
S Bruster

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the level of demand and supply of out of hours care from a nationally representative sample of general practice cooperatives.

designObservational study based on routinely collected data on telephone calls, patient population data from general practices, and information about cooperatives from interviews with managers.

setting20 cooperatives in England and Scotland selected after stratification by region and by size. SUBJECTS: 899 657 out of hours telephone calls over 12 months.

main outcome measuresNumbers and age and sex specific rates of calls; variation in demand and activity in relation to characteristics of the population; timing of calls; proportion of patients consulting at home, at a primary care centre, or on the telephone; response times; hospital admission rates.

resultsThe out of hours call rate (excluding bank holidays) was 159 calls per 1000 patients/year, with rates in children aged under 5 years four times higher than for adults. Little variation occurred by day of the week or seasonally. Cooperatives in Scotland experienced higher demand than those in England. Patients living in deprived areas made 70% more calls than those in non-deprived areas, but this had little effect on the overall variation in demand. 45.4% (408 407) of calls were handled by telephone advice, 23.6% (212 550) by a home visit, and 29.8% (267 663) at a centre. Cooperatives responded to 60% of calls within 30 minutes and to 83% within one hour. Hospital admission followed 5.5% (30 743/554 179) of out of hours calls (8 admissions per 1000 patients/year).

conclusionsThis project provides national baseline data for the planning of services and the analysis of future changes.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandAdultEmergency Medical ServicesFamily PracticeHouse CallsHumansInterprofessional RelationsPatient AdmissionScotlandTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID10698882
PMCPMC27306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.