Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10698881›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Systematic review of the effect of on-site mental health professionals on the clinical behaviour of general practitioners.

P Bower, B Sibbald

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Psychiatric referral rates and the influence of on-site mental health workers in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P BowerNational Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Williamson Building, University of Manchester M13 9PL, UK. peter.bower@man.ac.uk
B Sibbald

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the published literature concerning the effects of on-site mental health professionals on general practitioners' management of mental health.

designSystematic review of controlled trials.

settingPrimary care.

participantsGeneral practitioners and mental health professionals.

main outcome measuresConsultation rates, prescribing of psychotropics, and referrals to secondary care mental health services by general practitioners.

resultsThe effect of on-site mental health professionals on consultation rates was inconsistent. Referral to a mental health professional reduced the likelihood of a patient receiving a prescription for psychotropics or being referred to secondary care, although the effects were not consistent. An on-site mental health professional did not alter prescribing and referral behaviour towards patients in the wider practice population.

conclusionsThe secondary effects of mental health professionals on the clinical behaviour of general practitioners are comparatively modest and inconsistent and seem to be restricted to patients directly under the care of the mental health professional.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesHealth PersonnelProfessional PracticeHumansPhysicians, Family

Identifiers

PMID10698881
PMCPMC27305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.