Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10698719›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2000

Imprinted genes as potential genetic and epigenetic toxicologic targets.

S K Murphy, R L Jirtle

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. H19 gene methylation study in Indian buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).Veterinary research communications · 2013
    Article
  4. What is an epigenetic transgenerational phenotype? F3 or F2.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2008
    Review
  5. Epigenetic reprogramming and imprinting in origins of disease.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2007
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S K MurphyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
R L Jirtle
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

TUMOR SUPPRESSOR FUNCTION OF THE M6P/IGF2 RECEPTORR01ES008823 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JIRTLE, RANDY L · 1997 to 2007
$2.2M
SURVIVAL AND CARCINOGENESIS IN TRANSPLANTED HEPATOCYTESR01CA025951 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JIRTLE, RANDY L · 1985 to 2004
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA25951NIEHS NIH HHS ES08823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon in eutherian mammals that results in the differential expression of the paternally and maternally inherited alleles of a gene. Imprinted genes are necessary for normal mammalian development. This requirement has been proposed to have evolved because of an interparental genetic battle for the utilization of maternal resources during gestation and postnatally. The nonrandom requisite for monoallelic expression of a subset of genes has also resulted in the formation of susceptibility loci for neurobehavioral disorders, developmental disorders, and cancer. Since imprinting involves both cytosine methylation within CpG islands and changes in chromatin structure, imprinted genes are potential targets for dysregulation by epigenetic toxicants that modify DNA methylation and histone acetylation.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnvironmental PollutantsGenomic ImprintingHumansMutagensEnvironmental PollutantsMutagens

Identifiers

PMID10698719
PMCPMC1637779
OpenAlexW2085057450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.