Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10698518›Full record

ArticleOncogene2000

Cofactor competition between the ligand-bound oestrogen receptor and an intron 1 enhancer leads to oestrogen repression of ERBB2 expression in breast cancer.

S P Newman, N P Bates, D Vernimmen, M G Parker, H C Hurst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Association between Ancestry-Specific 6q25 Variants and Breast Cancer Subtypes in Peruvian Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. HER2: biology, detection, and clinical implications.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2011
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S P NewmanICRF Molecular Oncology Unit, ICSM @ Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
N P Bates
D Vernimmen
M G Parker
H C Hurst
Hammersmith Hospital · GBThe Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overexpression of the ERBB2 proto-oncogene in breast tumours, which occurs in 25-30% of patients, correlates with poor prognosis. In oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast epithelial cells oestrogens reduce ERBB2 mRNA and protein levels, an effect that is reversed in the presence of anti-oestrogens such as tamoxifen and ICI 182780. Our previous studies have shown that the major effect of oestrogen on ERBB2 expression is at the level of transcription and that this is mediated through a region within the ERBB2 first intron which can act as an oestrogen-suppressible enhancer in ER positive breast cells. In vitro footprinting of the smallest DNA fragment that retained full activity revealed four transcription factor binding sites. We report here that two of these sites are recognized by AP-2 proteins and the other two are bound by a variety of bZIP factors, including CREB and ATFI, with a major complex containing ATFa/ JunD. However, by using ER mutants it is clear that repression occurs essentially off the DNA. Indeed, the essential domain of the ER responsible for repression of the ERBB2 enhancer is a region termed AF2 which is required for the ligand-dependent association of non-DNA binding cofactors. We further demonstrate that one of these ER cofactors, SRC-1, can relieve oestrogen repression of the ERBB2 enhancer and conclude that these data fit with a model whereby the ER and the ERBB2 enhancer compete for this limiting, non-DNA binding cofactor. Thus, in oestrogenic conditions SRC-1 preferentially binds to the ER which effectively sequesters it thereby reducing enhancer activity, but in antioestrogenic media the cofactor is released from the ER and is therefore available to activate the ERBB2 enhancer.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, erbB-2Binding, CompetitiveBinding SitesBreast NeoplasmsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA FootprintingEnhancer Elements, GeneticErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogensFemaleHistone AcetyltransferasesHumansIntronsLigandsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedDNA-Binding ProteinsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogensHistone AcetyltransferasesLigandsMAS1 protein, humanNCOA1 protein, humanNeoplasm ProteinsNuclear Receptor Coactivator 1Proto-Oncogene MasReceptors, EstrogenTranscription Factor AP-2Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID10698518
OpenAlexW2026595973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.