ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2000
Possible mechanisms underlying the vasodilatation induced by olprinone, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, in rabbit coronary artery.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced function of endothelial prostacyclin in human omental resistance arteries in pre-eclampsia.The Journal of physiology · 2002Article
- Characterization of changes in mechanical responses to histamine in omental resistance arteries in pre-eclampsia.British journal of pharmacology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The possible mechanisms underlying the vasodilatation induced by olprinone, a phosphodiesterase type III inhibitor, were investigated in smooth muscle of the rabbit coronary artery. Isometric force and membrane potential were measured simultaneously using endothelium-denuded smooth muscle strips. Acetylcholine (ACh, 3 microM) produced a contraction with a membrane depolarization (15. 2+/-1.1 mV). In a solution containing 5.9 mM K(+), olprinone (100 microM) hyperpolarized the resting membrane and (i) caused the absolute membrane potential level reached with ACh to be more negative (but did not reduce the delta membrane potential seen with ACh, 15.2+/-1.8 mV) and (ii) attenuated the ACh-induced contraction. In a solution containing 30 mM K(+), these effects were not seen with olprinone. Glibenclamide (10 microM) blocked the olprinone-induced membrane hyperpolarization. 4-AP (0.1 mM) significantly attenuated the olprinone-induced resting membrane hyperpolarization but TEA (1 mM) had no such effect. Glibenclamide (10 +microM), TEA (1 mM) and 4-AP (0.1 mM), given separately, all failed to modify the inhibitory actions of olprinone on (i) the absolute membrane potential level seen with ACh and (ii) the ACh-induced contraction. It is suggested that olprinone inhibits the ACh-induced contraction through an effect on the absolute level of membrane potential achieved with ACh in smooth muscle of the rabbit coronary artery. It is also suggested that glibenclamide-sensitive, ATP-sensitive K(+) channels do not play an important role in the olprinone-induced inhibition of the ACh-induced contraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.