Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10692344›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2000

High-resolution imaging of antibodies by tapping-mode atomic force microscopy: attractive and repulsive tip-sample interaction regimes.

A San Paulo, R García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Substrate-Selective Adhesion of Metal Nanoparticles to Graphene Devices.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 3D Generation of Multipurpose Atomic Force Microscopy Tips.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A San PauloInstituto de Microelectrónica de Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28760 Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain.
R García

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A force microscope operated with an amplitude modulation feedback (usually known as tapping-mode atomic force microscope) has two tip-sample interaction regimes, attractive and repulsive. We have studied the performance of those regimes to imaging single antibody molecules. The attractive interaction regime allows determination of the basic morphologies of the antibodies on the support. More importantly, this regime is able to resolve the characteristic Y-shaped domain structure of antibodies and the hinge region between domains. Imaging in the repulsive interaction regime is associated with the irreversible deformation of the molecules. This causes a significant loss in resolution and contrast. Two major physical differences distinguish the repulsive interaction regime from the attractive interaction regime: the existence of tip-sample contact and the strength of the forces involved.

Indexed as

Aluminum SilicatesAntibodiesHumansMicroscopy, Atomic ForceSensitivity and SpecificitySerum AlbuminAluminum SilicatesAntibodiesmicaSerum Albumin

Identifiers

PMID10692344
PMCPMC1300757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.