Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10688661›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2000

Transcriptional repression by neuron-restrictive silencer factor is mediated via the Sin3-histone deacetylase complex.

A Roopra, L Sharling, I C Wood, T Briggs, U Bachfischer, A J Paquette, N J Buckley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 213 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. miR-96-5p expression is sufficient to induce and maintain the senescent cell fate in the absence of stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Genome-Wide Binding Profile for Human RE1 Silencing Transcription Factor Unveils a Unique Genetic Circuitry in Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Epigenetic Regulation of BDNF Gene during Development and Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A RoopraWellcome Laboratory for Molecular Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. aroopra@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
L Sharling
I C Wood
T Briggs
U Bachfischer
A J Paquette
N J Buckley
University College London · GBCalifornia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Molecular Control of Neural Cell Fate DeterminationR01NS023476 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSON, DAVID J · 1986 to 2009
$3.1M
NINDS NIH HHS NS23476NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS023476Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large number of neuron-specific genes characterized to date are under the control of negative transcriptional regulation. Many promoter regions of neuron-specific genes possess the repressor element repressor element 1/neuron-restrictive silencing element (RE1/NRSE). Its cognate binding protein, REST/NRSF, is an essential transcription factor; its null mutations result in embryonic lethality, and its dominant negative mutants produce aberrant expression of neuron-specific genes. REST/NRSF acts as a regulator of neuron-specific gene expression in both nonneuronal tissue and developing neurons. Here, we shown that heterologous expression of REST/NRSF in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is able to repress transcription from yeast promoters engineered to contain RE1/NRSEs. Moreover, we have taken advantage of this observation to show that this repression requires both yeast Sin3p and Rpd3p and that REST/NRSF physically interacts with the product of the yeast SIN3 gene in vivo. Furthermore, we show that REST/NRSF binds mammalian SIN3A and HDAC-2 and requires histone deacetylase activity to repress neuronal gene transcription in both nonneuronal and neuronal cell lines. We show that REST/NRSF binding to RE1/NRSE is accompanied by a decrease in the acetylation of histones around RE1/NRSE and that this decrease requires the N-terminal Sin3p binding domain of REST/NRSF. Taken together, these data suggest that REST/NRSF represses neuronal gene transcription by recruiting the SIN3/HDAC complex.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription, GeneticCell LineGene Expression RegulationHistone DeacetylasesHumansNeuronsRE1-Silencing Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsHistone DeacetylasesRE1-Silencing Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSIN3 protein, S cerevisiaeTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID10688661
PMCPMC110831
OpenAlexW2166984732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.