Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10685664›Full record

ReviewThe cancer journal from Scientific American2000

The future of interleukin-2: enhancing therapeutic anticancer vaccines.

W W Overwijk, M R Theoret, N P Restifo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The cancer journal from Scientific American, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Regression in primary cutaneous melanoma: etiopathogenesis and clinical significance.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Immunological and antitumor effects of IL-23 as a cancer vaccine adjuvant.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2006
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Gene therapy for brain tumors.Current oncology reports · 2000
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W W OverwijkSurgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1502, USA.
M R Theoret
N P Restifo
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZ01BC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RESTIFO, NICHOLAS P · 2006 to 2008
$6.4M
Intramural NIH HHS NIH0010139353Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010763Intramural NIH HHS Z99 TW999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of our efforts is to trigger the immune destruction of established cancer. Interleukin (IL)-2 can mediate the regression of tumors in patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. In animal models, the antitumor effects of IL-2 are mediated by T lymphocytes. Stimulation with specific antigen can enhance the ability of T cells to respond to IL-2 by triggering the rapid upregulation of the high-affinity IL-2 receptor. We are seeking to design recombinant and synthetic vaccines capable of preferentially priming T cells with specificity for tumor cells.

methodsThe antitumor activity of experimental vaccines is being studied preclinically using recently developed murine models that employ the mouse homologues of human tumor-associated antigens. Once the most effective experimental vaccines are optimized in experimental animals, clinical trials can be conducted. Vaccines are being evaluated for their ability to mediate the regression of established tumors, and a variety of immunologic correlates are being measured.

resultsIn animal models, vaccines based on molecularly defined tumor-associated antigens expressed in viral vectors or delivered as "naked" DNA stimulate the expansion of CD4+ and CD8+ tumor-specific T lymphocytes. Coadministration of IL-2 with these vaccines dramatically enhances their ability to mediate the regression of established cancer. In the clinic, treatment of melanoma patients with peptide vaccine and IL-2 resulted in objective responses in approximately 40% of patients, a response rate more than twice that typically achieved with IL-2 alone. Paradoxically, tumor-specific CD8+ T-cell levels were not increased in these patients.

conclusionThe addition of recombinant and synthetic cancer vaccines to a regimen of IL-2 can result in improved antitumor responses in both animal models and melanoma patients. Vaccine-primed, tumor-specific T cells may preferentially proliferate upon administration of IL-2. The apparent lack of increase in CD8+ T-cell numbers in this setting suggests that the vaccine-primed T cells functionally disappear after a transient period of activation. Preventing the disappearance of activated T cells upon IL-2 administration-for example, by blocking proapoptotic signals-may enhance the therapeutic effectiveness of anticancer vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsCancer VaccinesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveInterleukin-2Lymphocyte ActivationMiceNeoplasmsCancer VaccinesInterleukin-2

Identifiers

PMID10685664
PMCPMC2538796
OpenAlexW99575393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.