ReviewDrugs2000
Diuretics as a basis of antihypertensive therapy. An overview.
Review in Drugs, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Dorzolamide chlorhydrate versus acetazolamide in the management of chronic macular edema in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: description of three case reports.Ophthalmology and eye diseases · 2014Article
- Understanding uncontrolled hypertension: is it the patient or the provider?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2007Article
- Prescribing patterns of diuretics in multi-drug antihypertensive regimens.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2005Article
- Use of diuretics in cardiovascular disease: (2) hypertension.Postgraduate medical journal · 2004Review
- Use of diuretics in cardiovascular diseases: (1) heart failure.Postgraduate medical journal · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diuretics have been, except for during a few recent years, the most commonly used therapy for hypertension. Although use of these agents fell significantly in the early 1990s, since then it has begun to increase again. Their recent return to popularity reflects 3 major factors: (i) recognition of the effectiveness of much lower dosages than previously used, thereby providing good antihypertensive activity with fewer adverse effects; (ii) the excellent reductions in morbidity and mortality achieved by low dosage diuretic-based therapy in multiple randomised controlled trials in elderly patients with hypertension; and (iii) the increasing recognition that some diuretic-induced shrinkage of effective blood volume is essential for the adequate treatment of many, if not most, patients with hypertension. Therefore, diuretics will probably continue to be the basis for antihypertensive therapy, and the indapamide sustained release 1.5 mg formulation provides all the essential characteristics of diuretic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10678594What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.