Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10671902›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2000

The effect of staggered dosing of sucralfate on oral bioavailability of sparfloxacin.

M Kamberi, H Nakashima, K Ogawa, N Oda, S Nakano

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M KamberiThe Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Oita Medical University, Oita, Japan. marika@oita-med.ac.jp
H Nakashima
K Ogawa
N Oda
S Nakano
Oita University · JPOita Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate the effect of sucralfate on sparfloxacin absorption when administered concurrently or at strategically spaced dosing times designed to avoid the potential interaction.

methodsThe study was a four-way crossover design where eight healthy Japanese volunteers were randomized to one of four treatment sequences at entry. A 300 mg dose of sparfloxacin was administered alone for treatment A (control). Treatments B, C and D included sucralfate 1.5 g every 12 h for five doses. For treatment B, the fifth dose of sucralfate was administered concurrently with sparfloxacin 300 mg. For treatment C, 300 mg sparfloxacin was given 2 h prior to the fifth dose of sucralfate. Treatment D consisted of sparfloxacin 300 mg given 4 h prior to the fifth dose of sucralfate. Blood and urine samples were collected at predetermined time intervals for 72 h. Sparfloxacin concentrations in plasma and urine and the concentrations of sparfloxacin metabolite in urine were determined by high performance liquid chromatography assays.

resultsSucralfate administrated concurrently with sparfloxacin decreased the mean AUC(0,infinity) of sparfloxacin 2-fold (P<0.001) and the mean Cmax 2.1-fold (P<0.001) compared with sparfloxacin alone. When sucralfate was administrated 2 h after sparfloxacin, the mean AUC(0,infinity) was decreased 1.5-fold (P<0.01) and the mean Cmax 1.4-fold (P<0.01). Sucralfate did not alter the extent of absorption of sparfloxacin when it was given 4 h after the administration of sparfloxacin. The relative bioavailabilities for treatments B, C and D were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.35-0.65), 0.64 (95% CI: 0. 51-0.77), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.81-1.03), respectively, relative to sparfloxacin alone. The mean percentage of the sparfloxacin dose recovered in urine was significantly lower after sparfloxacin was administered with sucralfate than after sparfloxacin was administered alone or 2 h before the sucralfate dose (P<0.001). Treatments B, C and D were demonstrated to be equivalent to treatment A in the rate of absorption. The tmax, CLr and t1/2 were not significantly affected by sucralfate. The metabolism of sparfloxacin was not altered in the presence of sucralfate.

conclusionsOral administration of sucralfate with sparfloxacin or 2 h after sparfloxacin, decreased the extent of sparfloxacin absorption. When both drugs are to be administered together, sucralfate should be administered 4 h after sparfloxacin, allowing thus sufficient time for sparfloxacin absorption prior to the sucralfate dose and thereby minimizing the chance of a significant interaction.

Indexed as

FluoroquinolonesAdministration, OralAdultAnti-Infective AgentsAntitubercular AgentsAnti-Ulcer AgentsArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityCross-Over StudiesDrug Administration ScheduleDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansMaleMetabolic Clearance RateSucralfateAnti-Infective AgentsAntitubercular AgentsAnti-Ulcer AgentsFluoroquinolonessparfloxacinSucralfate

Identifiers

PMID10671902
PMCPMC2014908
OpenAlexW1881758056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.