Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10668895›Full record

ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2000

Pineal parenchymal tumors: a correlation of histological features with prognosis in 66 cases.

A Jouvet, G Saint-Pierre, F Fauchon, K Privat, E Bouffet, M M Ruchoux, L Chauveinc, M Fèvre-Montange

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pinealoblastomas in children.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2006
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Pineal Gland Parenchyma Tumors.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Histopathology and Molecular Pathology of Pineal Region Tumors.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  6. History of Treatment of Pineal Tumors.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Pineal Tumors and Pineal Region Tumors.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Pediatric brain tumors].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Pineal/germ cell tumors and pineal parenchymal tumors.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Review
  20. Histopathology and molecular pathology of pediatric pineal parenchymal tumors.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A JouvetHôpital Neurologique BP Lyon Montchat, France.
G Saint-Pierre
F Fauchon
K Privat
E Bouffet
M M Ruchoux
L Chauveinc
M Fèvre-Montange

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHO classification of CNS tumors divides pineal parenchymal tumors (PPT) into pineocytoma (PC), pineoblastoma (PB) and mixed pineocytoma-pineoblastoma or PPT with intermediate differentiation. The reported incidence of mixed/intermediate PPT varies and this may reflect the difficulty in classifying tumors of this type. In an attempt to overcome the problem of the classification of PPT with intermediate differentiation, we describe the relationship between histological features and patient survival in a large cooperative series of 66 PPT from 12 neurosurgical centres. All tumors were studied with both light microscopy and immunohistochemically using antibodies against glial markers or neural/neuroendocrine markers. Our series included 11 PC, 39 mixed/intermediate PPT and 16 PB. A number of mitoses greater than 6 and the presence of necrosis were associated with a poorer outcome, while positive immunostaining for neurofilaments was associated with a better survival. We propose a new prognostic grading of 4 grades, grade I for PC, grade II for PPT with fewer than 6 mitoses and positive immunolabelling for neurofilaments, grade III for PPT with either 6 or more than 6 mitoses or fewer than 6 mitoses but without immunostaining for neurofilaments and grade IV for PB.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryInfantMaleMiddle AgedPineal GlandPinealomaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID10668895
PMCPMC8098427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.