Differential growth: from carcinogenesis to liver repopulation.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The role of stem cells/progenitor cells in liver carcinogenesis in glycine N-methyltransferase deficient mice.Experimental and molecular pathology · 2010
   Article
2. Molecular events in hepatic preneoplasia: a review.Experimental and molecular pathology · 2010
   Review
3. Liver repopulation and carcinogenesis: two sides of the same coin?The American journal of pathology · 2008
   Review
4. Paracrine in vivo inhibitory effects of hepatitis B virus X protein (HBx) on liver cell proliferation: an alternative mechanism of HBx-related pathogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002
   Article
5. A growth-constrained environment drives tumor progression invivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2001
   Article
6. Massive liver replacement by transplanted hepatocytes in the absence of exogenous growth stimuli in rats treated with retrorsine.The American journal of pathology · 2001
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Liver regeneration in rats with retrorsine-induced hepatocellular injury proceeds through a novel cellular response.2000

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as