Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10657326›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Informed choice in genetic screening for thalassaemia during pregnancy: audit from a national confidential inquiry.

B Modell, R Harris, B Lane, M Khan, M Darlison, M Petrou, J Old, M Layton, L Varnavides

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Spontaneous rupture of the spleen at full term during pregnancy: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prenatal Diagnosis of Different Polymorphisms of β-globin Gene in Ahvaz.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Screening for beta thalassaemia.Indian journal of human genetics · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B ModellRoyal Free and University College London Medical School, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK.
R Harris
B Lane
M Khan
M Darlison
M Petrou
J Old
M Layton
L Varnavides
University College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNational audit of informed choice in antenatal screening for thalassaemia.

designAudit from the UK Confidential Enquiry into Counselling for Genetic Disorders.

settingThalassaemia module of the UK Confidential Enquiry into Counselling for Genetic Disorders. SUBJECTS: 138 of 156 couples who had had a pregnancy affected by a major beta thalassaemia from 1990 to 1994.

main outcome measuresHow and when genetic risk was identified for each couple, and whether and when prenatal diagnosis was offered.

resultsRisk was detected by screening before or during the first pregnancy in 49% (68/138) of couples and by diagnosis of an affected child in 28% (38/138) of couples. Prenatal diagnosis was offered in 69% (274/400) of pregnancies, ranging from 94% (122/130) for British Cypriots to 54% (80/149) for British Pakistanis and from 90% in the south east of England to 39% in the West Midlands. Uptake of prenatal diagnosis was 80% (216/274), ranging from 98% (117/120) among British Cypriots in either the first or second trimester to 73% (35/48) among British Pakistanis in the first trimester and 39% (11/28) in the second trimester. A demonstrable service failure occurred in 28% (110/400) of pregnancies, including 110 of 126 where prenatal diagnosis was not offered and 48 of 93 that ended with an affected liveborn infant.

conclusionAlthough antenatal screening and counselling for haemoglobin disorders are standard practices in the United Kingdom, they are delivered inadequately and inequitably. An explicit national policy is needed, aiming to make prenatal diagnosis in the first trimester available to all couples and including ongoing national audit.

Indexed as

Genetic ServicesHeterozygoteInformed ConsentChoice BehaviorEthnicityFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHealth PolicyHumansMedical AuditPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicPrenatal DiagnosisRisk FactorsEmpirical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Identifiers

PMID10657326
PMCPMC27278
OpenAlexW2074193095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.