The specialist of the discipline of general practice. Semantics and politics mustn't impede the progress of general practice.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice.Quality & safety in health care · 2002
   Trial
2. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Review
3. General practitioners' willingness to participate in research: A survey in central Switzerland.PloS one · 2019
   Article
4. A doctor close at hand: How GPs view their role in cancer care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2010
   Article
5. Family history in primary care: understanding GPs' resistance to clinical genetics--qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
   Article
6. [The diagnostic concept in family medicine: a view of the landscape. The diagnosis in family medicine].Atencion primaria · 2010
   Article
7. GPs with special interests: unanswered questions.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
   Article
8. The research domain of family medicine.Annals of family medicine · 2004
   Article
9. Enhancing public safety in primary care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002
   Review
10. Integrating genetics into primary care in practice.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
    Article
11. Informal carers and the primary care team.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
    Review
12. The case for strengthening education and training for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
    Article
13. Hereditary haemochromatosis: never seen a case?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
    Article
14. Networks for research in primary health care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
    Article
15. Is it time for a new definition of general practice? General practitioners' main interest is people.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000
    Article
16. The research needs of primary care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Is it time for a new definition of general practice? General practitioners specialize in their patients.2000
• Commented on by
  Is it time for a new definition of general practice? General practitioners' main interest is people.2000
• Commented on by
  Is it time for a new definition of general practice? Applying science of collectives to individual people results in paradox.2000

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as