Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10655240›Full record

ArticleGenetics2000

Comparative sequence analysis and patterns of covariation in RNA secondary structures.

J Parsch, J M Braverman, W Stephan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Translation: The Universal Structural Core of Life.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J ParschDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0211, USA.
J M Braverman
W Stephan

Funding

EVOL BY MUTATIONS WITH COMPENSATORY FITNESS INTERACTIONSR01GM058405 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI STEPHEN, WOLFGANG · 1998 to 2000
$248k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-58405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel method of RNA secondary structure prediction based on a comparison of nucleotide sequences is described. This method correctly predicts nearly all evolutionarily conserved secondary structures of five different RNAs: tRNA, 5S rRNA, bacterial ribonuclease P (RNase P) RNA, eukaryotic small subunit rRNA, and the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of the Drosophila bicoid (bcd) mRNA. Furthermore, covariations occurring in the helices of these conserved RNA structures are analyzed. Two physical parameters are found to be important determinants of the evolution of compensatory mutations: the length of a helix and the distance between base-pairing nucleotides. For the helices of bcd 3' UTR mRNA and RNase P RNA, a positive correlation between the rate of compensatory evolution and helix length is found. The analysis of Drosophila bcd 3' UTR mRNA further revealed that the rate of compensatory evolution decreases with the physical distance between base-pairing residues. This result is in qualitative agreement with Kimura's model of compensatory fitness interactions, which assumes that mutations occurring in RNA helices are individually deleterious but become neutral in appropriate combinations.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsDrosophilaRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID10655240
PMCPMC1460946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.