Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10653797›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2000

Detection of peptide-lipid interactions in mixed monolayers, using isotherms, atomic force microscopy, and fourier transform infrared analyses.

V Vié, N Van Mau, L Chaloin, E Lesniewska, C Le Grimellec, F Heitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

V ViéCBS, INSERM-U414, IURC, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 5, 21011 Dijon Cedex, France.
N Van Mau
L Chaloin
E Lesniewska
C Le Grimellec
F Heitz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve the understanding of the membrane uptake of an amphipathic and positively charged vector peptide, we studied the interactions of this peptide with different phospholipids, the nature of whose polar headgroups and physical states were varied. Three lipids were considered: dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol (DPPG), and dioleoylphosphatidylglycerol (DOPG). The approach was carried out by three complementary methods: compression isotherms of monolayers and atomic force microscopy observations associated with Fourier transform infrared investigations. From analysis of the compression isotherms, it was concluded that the peptide interacts with all lipids and with an expansion of the mean molecular area, implying that both components form nonideal mixtures. The expansion was larger in the case of DOPG than for DPPC and DPPG because of an alpha to beta conformational transition with an increase in the peptide molar fraction. Atomic force microscopy observations showed that the presence of small amounts of peptide led to the appearance of bowl-like particles and that an increase in the peptide amounts generated the formation of filaments. In the case of DOPG, filaments were found at higher peptide molar fractions than already observed for DOPC because of the presence of negatively charged lipid headgroups.

Indexed as

1,2-DipalmitoylphosphatidylcholineAmino Acid SequenceCircular DichroismMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMolecular ConformationMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesPhosphatidylglycerolsPhospholipidsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredSurface Properties1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol1,2-Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine1,2-dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerolPeptidesPhosphatidylglycerolsPhospholipids

Identifiers

PMID10653797
PMCPMC1300687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.