Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10648620›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2000

Epstein-Barr virus suppresses a G(2)/M checkpoint activated by genotoxins.

M Wade, M J Allday

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. EBV Persistence--Introducing the Virus.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M WadeSection of Virology and Cell Biology and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom.
M J Allday
Ludwig Cancer Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative Burkitt lymphoma-derived cell lines (for example, BL41 and Ramos) are extremely sensitive to genotoxic drugs despite being functionally null for the tumor suppressor p53. They rapidly undergo apoptosis, largely from G(2)/M of the cell cycle. 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine labeling experiments showed that although the treated cells can pass through S phase, they are unable to complete cell division, suggesting that a G(2)/M checkpoint is activated. Surprisingly, latent infection of these genotoxin-sensitive cells with EBV protects them from both apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, allowing them to complete the division cycle. However, a comparison with EBV-immortalized B-lymphoblastoid cell lines (which have functional p53) showed that EBV does not block apoptosis per se but rather abrogates the activation of, or signalling from, the checkpoint in G(2)/M. Furthermore, analyses of BL41 and Ramos cells latently infected with P3HR1 mutant virus, which expresses only a subset of the latent viral genes, showed that LMP-1, the main antiapoptotic latent protein encoded by EBV, is not involved in the protection afforded here by viral infection. This conclusion was confirmed by analysis of clones of BL41 stably expressing LMP-1 from a transfected plasmid, which respond like the parental cell line. Although steady-state levels of Bcl-2 and related proteins varied between BL41 lines and clones, they did not change significantly during apoptosis, nor was the level of any of these anti- or proapoptotic proteins predictive of the outcome of treatment. We have demonstrated that a subset of EBV latent gene products can inactivate a cell cycle checkpoint for monitoring the fidelity and timing of cell division and therefore genomic integrity. This is likely to be important in EBV-associated growth transformation of B cells and perhaps tumorigenesis. Furthermore, this study suggests that EBV will be a unique tool for investigating the intimate relationship between cell cycle regulation and apoptosis.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBurkitt LymphomaCisplatinDrug ResistanceG2 PhaseGene ExpressionGenes, ViralHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansMitosisMutagensPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Tumor Cells, CulturedViral Matrix ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinEBV-associated membrane antigen, Epstein-Barr virusMutagensPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Viral Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID10648620
PMCPMC85280
OpenAlexW2139700920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.