Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10645956›Full record

ArticleGenome research2000

Bacterial artificial chromosome libraries for mouse sequencing and functional analysis.

K Osoegawa, M Tateno, P Y Woon, E Frengen, A G Mammoser, J J Catanese, Y Hayashizaki, P J de Jong

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 302 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mouse X-linked microRNA cluster regulates the meiotic checkpoint andProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Altered theta and beta oscillatory synchrony in a genetic mouse model of pathological anxiety.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Fbxw7 is a driver of uterine carcinosarcoma by promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Endothelial-Specific Cre Mouse Models.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K OsoegawaDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263 USA.
M Tateno
P Y Woon
E Frengen
A G Mammoser
J J Catanese
Y Hayashizaki
P J de Jong
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

LARGE INSERT PAC LIBRARY FOR THE RAT GENOMER01HL055700 · NHLBI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE · PI DE JONG, PIETER J. · 1995 to 1996
–
CSR NIH HHS 1RO1RG01165NHLBI NIH HHS 1RO1HL55700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) and P1-derived artificial chromosome (PAC) libraries providing a combined 33-fold representation of the murine genome have been constructed using two different restriction enzymes for genomic digestion. A large-insert PAC library was prepared from the 129S6/SvEvTac strain in a bacterial/mammalian shuttle vector to facilitate functional gene studies. For genome mapping and sequencing, we prepared BAC libraries from the 129S6/SvEvTac and the C57BL/6J strains. The average insert sizes for the three libraries range between 130 kb and 200 kb. Based on the numbers of clones and the observed average insert sizes, we estimate each library to have slightly in excess of 10-fold genome representation. The average number of clones found after hybridization screening with 28 probes was in the range of 9-14 clones per marker. To explore the fidelity of the genomic representation in the three libraries, we analyzed three contigs, each established after screening with a single unique marker. New markers were established from the end sequences and screened against all the contig members to determine if any of the BACs and PACs are chimeric or rearranged. Only one chimeric clone and six potential deletions have been observed after extensive analysis of 113 PAC and BAC clones. Seventy-one of the 113 clones were conclusively nonchimeric because both end markers or sequences were mapped to the other confirmed contig members. We could not exclude chimerism for the remaining 41 clones because one or both of the insert termini did not contain unique sequence to design markers. The low rate of chimerism, approximately 1%, and the low level of detected rearrangements support the anticipated usefulness of the BAC libraries for genome research.

Indexed as

Genomic LibraryAnimalsBacteriophage P1Brain ChemistryChromosomes, BacterialDNAFemaleGenetic MarkersKidneyMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMolecular Sequence DataReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNASpleenDNAGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID10645956
PMCPMC310499
OpenAlexW2126969864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.