Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10644776›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2000

Neurocysticercosis and epilepsy in developing countries.

D K Pal, A Carpio, J W Sander

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 216 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antiepileptic drugs for seizure control in people with neurocysticercosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Volumetric MRI study of the brain in patients with neurocysticercosis and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Challenges in the Diagnosis ofVeterinary medicine international · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Antiepileptic drugs for seizure control in people with neurocysticercosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D K PalNeurosciences Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK. d.pal@ucl.ac.uk
A Carpio
J W Sander
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurocysticercosis is a disease of poverty and underdevelopment. Little is known about the natural history of the infection in humans, but some of the mechanisms whereby the parasite remains silent and evades the host immune response are understood. Symptomatic neurocysticercosis usually results from host inflammatory response after parasite death, and the clinical manifestations can be diverse. There is no evidence that cysticidal treatment does more good than harm in addition to conventional antiepileptic treatment. Population control measures involving immunisation or mass treatment have not shown long term effectiveness.Epilepsy, similarly to neurocysticercosis, is a largely unrecognised but increasing burden on the welfare and economies of developing countries. The technology of drug treatment and psychosocial rehabilitation is well known but requires widespread and effective dissemination at low cost. There is little epidemiological data on risk factors for epilepsy in developing countries on which to base prevention strategies. The public health prioritisation of chronic disorders such as epilepsy remains a challenge for policy and practice in developing countries. For both neurocysticercosis and epilepsy, there is a dilemma about whether limited public resources would better be spent on general economic development, which would be expected to have a broad impact on the health and welfare of communities, or on specific programmes to help individual affected people with neurocysticercosis and epilepsy. Either approach requires detailed economic evaluation.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesEpilepsyNeurocysticercosisCost of IllnessHumans

Identifiers

PMID10644776
PMCPMC1736787
OpenAlexW2109080519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.