Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10642531›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal2000

Differential recognition of snake venom proteins expressing specific Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence motifs by wild-type and variant integrin alphaIIbbeta3: further evidence for distinct sites of RGD ligand recognition exhibiting negative allostery.

S Rahman, G Flynn, A Aitken, Y Patel, F Hussain, X Lu, J C Loftus, D French, E Wijelath, K Strand and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cadherin 6 has a functional role in platelet aggregation and thrombus formation.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2012
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

S RahmanThe Coagulation Research Laboratory, GKT Medical School, St. Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, U.K. s.rahman@kcl.ac.uk
G Flynn
A Aitken
Y Patel
F Hussain
X Lu
J C Loftus
D French
E Wijelath
K Strand
G F Savidge
Lambeth Hospital · GBHope Heart Institute · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USThrombosis Research Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated that the amino acid residues flanking the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence of high-affinity ligands modulate their specificity of interaction with integrin complexes. Because of the absence of structural data for integrin complexes with bound ligand, the molecular basis for this specificity modulation remains obscure. In a previous paper [Rahman, Lu, Kakkar and Authi (1995) Biochem. J. 312, 223-232] we demonstrated that two genetically distinct venom-derived RGD proteins, kistrin and dendroaspin (both containing the sequence PRGDMP), were simple competitors, indicating the recognition of an identical binding site on the alpha(IIb)beta(3) complex. Furthermore, both kistrin and dendroaspin inhibited the binding of the disintegrin elegantin (containing the sequence ARGDNP) via a non-competitive mechanism, suggesting that the binding of elegantin to the alpha(IIb)beta(3) complex was at a remote site and down-regulated via an allosteric mechanism. Here we present further evidence for distinct RGD ligand recognition sites on the alpha(IIb)beta(3) complex that exhibit a negative allosteric relationship. A panel of well-characterized recombinant dendroaspin and elegantin derivatives were employed for this study. These recombinant molecules were constructed as glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins with either an Ala or Pro residue N-terminal to the RGD sequence in combination with either a Met or an Asn residue immediately C-terminal. Equilibrium competition experiments showed that elegantin binding to ADP-treated platelets was inhibited by derivatives Eleg. AM (ARGDMP) and Eleg. PM (PRGDMP) via an allosteric competitive mechanism, providing direct evidence that modulation of the RGD motif can alter competitive behaviour. In addition, recombinant kistrin and dendroaspin both inhibited elegantin binding via a non-competitive mechanism, confirming our previous observations. Further evidence for distinct binding sites employing an independent approach was obtained by analysing the binding of the panel of venom proteins to the functionally defective heterodimer alpha(IIb)beta(3) Ser(123)-->Ala expressed on Chinese hamster ovary cells. These studies demonstrated that simple competitors kistrin and dendroaspin bound with high affinity to the variant integrin complex. In contrast, the binding of elegantin and most significantly, recombinant Dendro. PN (PRGDNP) and Dendro. AN (ARGDNP) were abolished. These observations, taken together, are consistent with a model depicting the presence of distinct sites of RGD ligand recognition on the alpha(IIb)beta(3) complex that show the preferential recognition of specific RGD motifs. Competition experiments demonstrate a negative allosteric relationship between these RGD recognition sites.

Indexed as

AlanineAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsBinding, CompetitiveBinding SitesCHO CellsCricetinaeElapid VenomsHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataOligopeptidesPeptidesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAlaninearginyl-glycyl-aspartic acidElapid VenomselegantinkistrinmambinOligopeptidesPeptidesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSerineSnake Venoms

Identifiers

PMID10642531
PMCPMC1220807
OpenAlexW2016000626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.